Andrei O. pfp

Andrei O.

@andrei0x309

759 Following
2230 Followers


Andrei O. pfp
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
Not that I'm tribalistic, but I thought FC would be forever tied mostly with EVM, FID is on EVM, are there plans to be able to modify contracts to build a bridge to move the FID on Solana? I find it pretty hard to understand FC goals: 1 Create a good decentralized social network? 2 Onboard non-crypto people to crypto? 3 Attract crypto people from multiple ecosystems/platforms? 4 Focus on mini-apps to extract to monetize from client-side? 5 Attract non-crypto people? 6 Empower user ownership and reduce favoritism and censorship? I don't know, it feels like this product walks 10 paths at the same time, it feels very chaotic, to be clear I personally thought that the idea of slowly and iteratively creating a quality decentralized social protocol with a long runway (10y was first said) was the true goal. I'm trying to put myself into normie shoes, like someone that would come from Bluesky, and I imagine I would be spooked by 400+ features that seem disconnected from what I would expect from social media.
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Andrei O. pfp
3 replies
2 recasts
16 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
I see some opposition to this to be fair, the reality is that all social media platforms use this in some way the problem with this is not the verifications themselves, but in fact, that they are detached from the protocol, making the protocol less valuable. This should have been something that each client was forced to implement, it should have been a requirement at the protocol level, but that's also problematic because there aren't technical avenues to do that properly, as you have to rely on "good" clients. The saddest thing about this is, that this represents a crack into the facade that decentralization is safe, folks are willing to sacrifice the protocol if it means a client can be a little better. I also agree with @v here that you have to have these or similar mechanisms, but that is only if you have rewards. There is a simple and more effective solution here: stop rewards. A lot of people comlained that this is not the way to foster a useful social network, and is hard to disagree with that.
0 reply
1 recast
16 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
1 reply
1 recast
6 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
Added new features/changes to fosscaster.xyz repo. Current features: - Sign up to Farcaster network using your EOA - Login to Farcaster network using The EOA that owns the FID or by providing an auth token - Cast, like, recast, quote, bookmark, delete cast - Bookmark casts page - Settings page - Multi accounts - Interacting with mini-apps including, doing TXs with your EOA - Uploading videos(if you account is allowed) and upload images - Update your farcaster profile - Add Mini apps as favorites and enable disable notifications for them - Search (un unauthenticated / guest mode) - Website full in guest mode, connect modal will appear only when you try to do an action that requires authentification Disable Waprcast trackers The primary unauthenticated feed is cryptoleft YouTube embeds (watch YouTube videos without leaving the website ) DMs and group chats without trackers Multi-mini-app runs up to 6 Mini apps concomitantly Animated avatars Compose cast intent Storage usage widget +... ran out of characters
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
1 reply
2 recasts
8 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
2 replies
2 recasts
19 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
The web wallet is a pretty good improvement, especially because it imported the same embedded wallet. I guess for sign-in to work, the user will need to add the Warpcast wallet address later as an Auth address. There are some design questions here: 1 Will auth be done automatically since Warpcast holds the custody key, or user will be prompted if he wants to be more in line with the user's choice?, and not to use the PK of the user without consent? 2 Since the user can authorize any address(except the custody since that's already authorized) for better UX sign-in should work with both the embedded wallet and external wallet there's no reason why an external wallet would not be supported for auth in this case. 3 IMO 7 days session days will just create frustration, users are used to the long-term session that practically never expires, the session expiration should match the auth token expiration, but users should be able to log out of the embed wallet for security reasons.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Mini Apps

blog.flashsoft.eu - Farcaster Mini Apps

A Farcaster Mini App by andrei0x309

A mini app by andrei0x309.

SveleteKit Starter Mini-App - Farcaster Mini Apps

A Farcaster Mini App by andrei0x309

A mini app by andrei0x309.

fosscaster.xyz - Farcaster Mini Apps

A Farcaster Mini App by andrei0x309

A mini app by andrei0x309.