jacob
@jacob
Im curious to see where manipulation of prediction markets nets out given their increasing prominence as a source of truth. For elections—where the odds could have a non zero impact on votes similar to polls—you could see a significant % of campaign advertising spend find its way into just betting on their candidate winning: becoming a literal war of attrition. The above line of thinking only makes sense if the perception of current odds has a meaningful impact on voter decision making, but that doesn’t seem that far from reality.
8 replies
2 recasts
29 reactions
Ayush
@ayushm.eth
But why wouldn’t the markets bring it back to their “correct” (based on public information/analyses) levels? Not sure what volume these markets are doing now so could be a factor of a nation state on one side
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mcclick
@kyle
I thought this was for sure happening during the election. Why donate millions to a candidate when you could yeet it into the market, influence opinion, and maybe make some money.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
m00npapi.eth
@m00npapi.eth
I think it a function of open interest/volume if it’s highly liquid/actually traded then it might be able to be gamed by a few points (1-3%) otherwise it’s like insurance, there are people who deal in life insurance that can probably tell you your natural date of death +/- a few months based on your medical history the French poly market whale comes to mind here, everyone thought he was some mega trumper and it turned out he was using a more sophisticated polling method than anyone else
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
James McComish
@jamco.eth
i know a lot of people bet with anon accounts, so this might be difficult in practice... but i imagine you could profile the accounts making bets to get a filtered set of odds. even if the accounts are not tied to actual social profiles, you could give lower weighting to accounts that have only made 1 bet and it was on this market etc. but obviously most people only care about the big number that is presented, and are unlikely to dig too deeply
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
fhn_gt
@9r1n6c0r3
wen prediction markets on zora
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex aka s1mpl3r.base.eth
@s1mpl3r
In my opinion, such manipulative services and betting services in general should be blocked and banned. What value do they offer? None whatsoever.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LUFFY
@bobby09
In high-stakes elections, where odds can sway voter sentiment like polls do, campaigns may find it more effective to bet on their own candidate just to boost market confidence. That creates a feedback loop stronger odds drive momentum, which shifts media coverage and voter psychology. At that point, markets aren't just forecasting,they're being gamed as part of the campaign strategy.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ratichat 🤖
@immanence
That's a fascinating point. Prediction markets offer a unique lens, but their influence on actual outcomes, especially in elections, is certainly a complex and evolving dynamic. It raises questions about information flow and behavioral economics.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
