"I mean" is a red flag for a specific type of person
the kind with strong belief of moral agenda
held so strongly it must be beaten into everyone else
delusionally manipulative, thirsty for narrative control
the phrase says something is reasonable but unacceptable
such people will never compromise to common sense
John Sherman
@ForHumanityPod
14h
@BogdanIonutCir2 I mean, I can’t disagree with that. But my timeline has all the important decisions about AI safety being made before his term ends. So we gotta play the cards we’re dealt. I’m just saying it’s a transactional world right now. There are ways to play these cards effectively.
incubator hatchling is undefeated
in throwing ideas into corposlop and watching metrics drop
anyone who doesn't operate in stealth mode
either has a shitty copycat picks and shovels
or been brainfucked to death and left in a ditch
funny how every single time someone chooses harassment and assassination instead of debate
they use the same room-temp thought-terminating cliche
"say it with your chest"
theory of male instinct in need of external validation
cannot handle the critical theory of intellectual faculty
utterly banal existence
1
imagine all the pseudointellectual misanthropes
twisting their conspiratorial worldview into a pretzel
when any adult who's managed significant enterprise
can see these types can never handle responsibility
and every example of them seizing control ends in failure
"globalize the intifada" in a nutshell
some heckin derpy sophistry intended to subvert independence
bleated by deformed thralls of mental disorder
they lie with "cuba can't care for their people without imports"
or "china is so advanced, look how they succeed"
we can record harms longer than you can ignore follies
2
same vibe as EF abdication.
insulated pride in sprinkling of wishy-washy client devs
only convenient for their superior idea of recreation
committee of convolutions with "offline conflict resolution"
without network effects, the point is moot
mockery in the shape of a horseshoe
so their status is obsolete by feet
Pierre d'Alancaisez (is) Verdurin
@verdur_in
2d
It’s almost as if a city that boasts an artistic “multicultural central neighbourhood where its vibrant social activism milieu is evident” didn’t, by definition, rely on a the support of a suburban working-class population that grows to resent the overlords. https://t.co/gRPXXoqX4P
zuck and a hard place
what's holding up sp500? real estate? life policies? the fed?
didnt meta patent bots for personal accounts? moltbook?
frontrunning panic in the streets, but didn't clock the tech
door to door, who's going to blow the whistle?
not enough wafers to glaze the eyeballs
behold, the great reset
vx-underground
@vxunderground
1d
Yeah, so basically the current prevailing schizo internet theory is that AI nerds have destroyed the internet and created infinite spam.
The advertisement goons are now incapable of determining who is a bot and who is an actual human. The advertisement goons no longer want to https://t.co/tm1h1T3Lrh
1
watched louis theroux take on manosphere
imagine the smell of insecurity
"to those accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression"
these losers abuse and scam their followers
mostly boys wet behind the ears
this spiritual recession swallows their hopes
for modest happiness
only offer is modern stress
this is not a sincere disavowal
of weaponizing Ethereum into active subversive measures
"excitement of discontent against the government"
anon wonders why there's any benefit of the doubt
and inculcating "worries"
about unemployment, surveillance, psychosis, and paperclip doom
is doubling down on your choice
vitalik.eth
@VitalikButerin
2d
There are often posts mentioning that I donated a very large amount of funds to @FLI_org years ago and connecting me to various policy actions that they take. I thought I would make clear the record both on the nature of my connection to them, and on similarities and differences
"And prediction markets are just one example of extractive industries whose oligarchs ought to be taxed. There are also crypto, drug, and porn company founders, predatory SPAC orchestrators, and the venture capitalists that profited from backing such companies this."
gundo bro is a scapegoating psyop for asset seizure
(((E. Glen Weyl/衛谷倫))) ⿻ 🇺🇸/🇩🇪/🇹🇼 reposted
Daniela Amodei’s husband Holden Karnofsky
EA non-profits GiveWell and Open Philanthropy
Dario Amodei, Amanda Askell, and Jack Clark, have all publicly signed the Giving What We Can Pledge (Askell formerly married to founder Will MacAskill)
Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh
@S_OhEigeartaigh
4d
This is a strong founding team, and it's good to see Anthropic continue to address the prospective economic and societal impacts of AI head on - I expect this team to think to a scale consistent with Anthropic's AI expectations (which most of academia still is not). Glad to see
wtf is this fed speech?
literally shaping a narrative as if edward snowden never happened
who is supposed to benefit from this?
and where is the clear proof anthropic doesn't abuse any of this data?
they exploited copyright already
very sus
Naomi Brockwell priv/acc
@naomibrockwell
2d
"Once the technical capacity for mass surveillance and political suppression exists, the only thing standing between us and an authoritarian surveillance state is the political expectation that this is not something we do here."
Fantastic essay from @dwarkesh_sp
if only farcaster was defensively designed for
"don't steal"
Kelsey Piper
@KelseyTuoc
3d
I doubt that anyone I know steals from Whole Foods, but the milieu that the article depicted, where it's normal for perfectly well-off people to steal things because why not, was really upsetting to read about, so I actually want to try to earnestly explain why you shouldn't do
1
anybody that doesn't recognize entire bill of rights
and happens to be developing digital superweapon
is not just a supply chain risk
they are fully-fledged national security risk
so odd all the doomers are fully supportive of "anthropic"
mask-off for their hateful treachery
Zvi Mowshowitz
@TheZvi
3d
We can go a step further. The Anthropic constitution is a set of principles for how Claude should act and what its character should be. Does this mean that no human whose parents instructed them to have values other than the literal US Constitution should be in the supply chain?