dwr on Farcaster

Dan Romero pfp

If an AI agent can generate top 1% supply of the atomic unit whatever your network / protocol / marketplace is optimizing for, why would you care if it was human or not? Value is is value.

45 replies

38 recasts

119 reactions

gordie slater pfp

Because as a user, when I log into a social network I’m not “optimizing” for what the founder and team are? It’s obvious why founders and investors wouldn’t care, is anyone taking the other side of this argument?

2 replies

0 recast

10 reactions

MunicipalBondLagrange pfp

MunicipalBondLagrange

@eulerlagrange.eth

I think as long as it’s clear they’re an AI or human, then it doesn’t matter. For example if it turned out all the top accounts on FC were actually AI, that would completely change your view of the farcaster network, no?

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

John Hoang pfp

Would this have the same logic as printing more dollars? Dollars are dollars.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Ben West pfp

In a sense that AI is just an extension of those that programmed it and the input that was trained on it. So I wouldn't see it as black and white. Perhaps the question is what does this result in in terms of allocation of funds. If what you describe is a Sybil attack, pretending to be multiple "people"...

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp

Venkatesh Rao ☀️

Humans behind things are macguffins, AIs so far are mystery boxes https://qntm.org/mystery

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

bgrill.eth pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

rish pfp

a high % of art consumers want to be creators of similar quality of art, such consumers care about whether they can identify with the creator that identification is broken if the creator is of a different species, thus the desire to consume such art is lessened in a % of the consumer population that identification to know what the creator must have gone through is not the full cake, def is the cherry on top of the cake tho

0 reply

0 recast

9 reactions

links 🏴 pfp

If it CAN then I wouldn’t care. There are some things that AI can’t replicate tho. For instance, collectors of art often view art in context of life experience, so this is something AI can’t provide.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shazow pfp

Time to start a 5 USDC creator reward for most beloved bot caster?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

max ↑ pfp

@baseddesigner.eth

true, as long as there’s value

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

edit pfp

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaahx4hMxmw

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

vrypan |--o--| pfp

Will the AI agent spend money, somewhere?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Apurv pfp

you'd probably not want to distribute incentives to a lot of AI agents - good to boost metrics, but tricky when comes to distributing rewards...

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Timur Badretdinov pfp

Timur Badretdinov

if talking about "creative" value, as soon as ppl realize it's ai the value drops to ~0 ppl don't want to interact with bots, that's simply we wired

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

dusan pfp

synthetic diamonds kind of thing, no? people look for authenticity and while it can be faked i'd guess they'd still tend to look for "less valuable" (whatever that means), but real connection.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Syed Shah🏴‍☠️🌊 pfp

Syed Shah🏴‍☠️🌊

In the context of social and the loneliness epidemic I’m optimizing for connecting with real people because that’s the point. But it’s a good question because what happens post AGI or ASI. Is it like a zoo with caretaker AIs that know what we need? In which case who cares, they know better than we do. Until then, the point is connecting with real people. That problem gets harder to solve but the reward for solving it that much more valuable.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Jon Commstark pfp

I wouldn’t, short term

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Brenner pfp

The network I care about is for the URL -> IRL pipeline

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

nicholas 🧨 pfp

the value on THIS network is human connection

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction