ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
i read the entire paper that everyone’s citing as “ChatGPT makes you dumb” and made a 90 second video on it if you have the attention to watch it
21 replies
17 recasts
106 reactions
Igor Yuzovitskiy pfp
Igor Yuzovitskiy
@igoryuzo.eth
This short video is really good, summarized everything quickly and kept it light and entertaining. Would digest articles in this format
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Kyle Patrick pfp
Kyle Patrick
@kylepatrick.eth
Oh my god this is the gold standard for content id love to see on farcaster
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Grey pfp
Grey
@greygood
rote memorization will fix it
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
johnsterlaccii pfp
johnsterlaccii
@sterlacci
@grok summarize this
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
erica pfp
erica
@erica
"if you have the attention to watch" 💀
0 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
Lothan pfp
Lothan
@lothan
I saw a YT shorts of Christophe explaining the same (?) study here: https://youtube.com/shorts/-zTQ6tVHSwA But I got to give you the win here, you actually added the very important bit about the "switcheroo"! Instead of "ChatGPT is bad" you should say "ChatGPT can be bad if used improperly" (like you said 😁)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
sssintink pfp
sssintink
@sssintink.eth
‎Cool video. But the real issue isn’t whether GPT makes you dumb... it’s who decides what it teaches you. ‎ ‎Me personally, I’m not blaming the tool. I’m questioning the system behind it. ‎ ‎1. ChatGPT won’t make you dumb. Blind trust will. ‎ ‎2. History was written by winners. Now it’s rewritten by algorithms trained by them. ‎ ‎3. What started as help became quiet control. ‎ ‎4. Information isn’t neutral it’s shaped by power. ‎ ‎5. ChatGPT isn’t the threat. The hands behind it are. ‎ ‎That’s why skepticism and alternative sources matter. ‎And yes, I even wrote this after asking GPT itself if the phrasing made sense.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
atown pfp
atown
@atown
@v getting degraded audio here very choppy
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Pichi pfp
Pichi
@pichi
Love this video! I hate staring at a blank page so I love using AI to kick start things. It’s usually so bad that it helps me think of what I absolutely don’t want to include and helps me brainstorm. When I use it to edit, it always wants to completely rewrite my style and I HATE it but I love it as a proof reader and asking it specific things to clarify like, how might a non native English speaker interpret this to help me clarify things. I can’t imagine letting it run wild. But this makes me think about how and when I should use it more.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
EulerLagrangodamus pfp
EulerLagrangodamus
@eulerlagrange
I’m so tempted to say “Fuck you Ted” and blame it on chatgpt
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tyler ↑ pfp
tyler ↑
@trh
Counterpoint: the results may* have had more to do with the study design than anything. https://theconversation.com/mit-researchers-say-using-chatgpt-can-rot-your-brain-the-truth-is-a-little-more-complicated-259450 *Not saying it doesn't break one's brain, just that the study design isn't clear and the impact could be less than expected.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
triumph pfp
triumph
@triumph
“if you have the attention to watch it” man down man DOWN i’ve been hit
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
𒂭_𒂭 pfp
𒂭_𒂭
@m-j-r.eth
sounds like habituation vs a tolerance break. if the improvement can be measured, then intelligence augmentation has optimal dosage. wonder if we'll need neo-Luddites just for a critical reference, should tasks be completely reverse-engineered and disappear from culture altogether.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dee pfp
Dee
@dee21
Love this video!! The first 2 findings were normal and I went of course thats what would happen but the last one really shocked me and just goes to say that we need to balance it all out to get the most out of it. Dont depend fully on AI and just use it as an assistance to your thought process instead of your main!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nicolaus pfp
Nicolaus
@nicolaus
This was awesome. I’ve been deep diving in deep the last few weeks and feel like it’s exponentially accelerated my thinking and output. I feel like one of those brain only kids who got to use it for the first time. One thing I’m keeping in mind is at the end of the day I’m still the one having to synthesize what it’s giving me and make decisions or form conclusions. I’ve tried asking it to make decisions on my behalf and it underwhelmed me because it only has the context I’ve given it to do so and isn’t actually intelligent.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mehdi Benembarek pfp
Mehdi Benembarek
@mehdi-benembarek
Thesis, antithesis, synthesis … foundation for a feel free life, with or without AI Cheers
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghost 🎩 pfp
Ghost 🎩
@ghostbo4.eth
Ngl i how the “ brain using people “ Did good with and without the AI
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rubinovitz pfp
rubinovitz
@rubinovitz
Yess paper summary videos ♥️
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Babooun pfp
Babooun
@babooun
Thanks a lot for the great summary! This enhanced brain activity for the brain group using LLM makes me wonder how the brain would light up in case of peer writing with another human. I’de expect it to be similar cause the key point here is full AI delegation vs smart collaboration.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction