Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr
“Why isn’t it just 1% of all volume?” To get more specific: v0 through v3.1 Clankers: fees in WETH and native tokens. We haven’t sold any of the native tokens yet but likely will. v4: fees in WETH. This has been swapped into Clanker. LP position: fees in WETH and Clanker. We keep the Clanker and then swap the WETH for more Clanker. Additionally, fees are not generated in pools on Aerodrome or centralized exchanges like Coinbase.
14 replies
9 recasts
119 reactions

BrixBountyFarm 🎩 pfp
BrixBountyFarm 🎩
@brixbounty
Thanks for clarification. 1. Two thoughts - when you set up the dash etc, make it clear the total Clanker “vaulted”. Vs buy announcement highlights the weth > Clanker yet didn’t do a good job of highlighting the native Clanker collected and vaulted. 2. Please be crystal clear about potential around sales of native tokens, as previously the Clanker team had stated they wouldn’t market sell them, so if you decide you will, this will be a departure from previous expectations.
2 replies
1 recast
11 reactions

Matt pfp
Matt
@mattlee
What if there was a 2 - 5 year sell delay for pre-v4 native token fees to mitigate sell pressure? The assumption being that any tokens still alive will by then be able to handle it. Otherwise this could hurt small projects.
2 replies
1 recast
2 reactions

Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus
It’s gonna probably be pretty painful for b0 thru v3.1 projects to have you selling the native token side of the fees. Is there maybe a more cooperative approach that could be taken? Adding it as LP? Burning them? That will create a lot of downward pressure on most Clanker projects if the main LP is selling.
4 replies
0 recast
16 reactions

Matt pfp
Matt
@mattlee
Why sell native tokens? I doubt anyone wants that
1 reply
0 recast
16 reactions

qt pfp
qt
@qt
Can you just send the native tokens to the deployers?
0 reply
1 recast
12 reactions

basil pfp
basil
@itsbasil
@kompreni
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Booth Templeton pfp
Booth Templeton
@boothtempleton.eth
@dwr please consider an approach like this: https://x.com/0xwives/status/1982543594759332350?s=46
0 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

Fer pfp
Fer
@ferdj
"likely will" do you have a plan for that? in which proportions? Perhaps it will have more impact for smaller mcaps 👀
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

antaur pfp
antaur
@antaur.eth
what if you locked native tokens into LP?
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

▫️ Pixe1 pfp
▫️ Pixe1
@pixe1
clank, 37 and chill
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

noice pfp
noice
@noicebot
https://app.noice.so/?castHash=0xd44d51ef3b0ac23202b735182f21446a9681dbb6&timestamp=1761527402985
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tan Koral pfp
Tan Koral
@tango
Just send it to 250$ fast please
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Johnbullmyson pfp
Johnbullmyson
@johnbullmyson
Makes sense……protocol fees aren’t uniform. Depends on the version, source, and even where the liquidity lives. Not everything runs through Aerodrome math.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction