Dan Romero
@dwr
“Why isn’t it just 1% of all volume?” To get more specific: v0 through v3.1 Clankers: fees in WETH and native tokens. We haven’t sold any of the native tokens yet but likely will. v4: fees in WETH. This has been swapped into Clanker. LP position: fees in WETH and Clanker. We keep the Clanker and then swap the WETH for more Clanker. Additionally, fees are not generated in pools on Aerodrome or centralized exchanges like Coinbase.
14 replies
9 recasts
119 reactions
Maretus
@maretus
It’s gonna probably be pretty painful for b0 thru v3.1 projects to have you selling the native token side of the fees. Is there maybe a more cooperative approach that could be taken? Adding it as LP? Burning them? That will create a lot of downward pressure on most Clanker projects if the main LP is selling.
4 replies
0 recast
16 reactions
InsideTheSim 🎩🍪
@insidethesim.eth
Agreed. Understandable to want to make the money off treasury sales from the acquisition — but would be way more community forward to LP and harvest from boosting those early projects rather than do what will be seen as “dumping” on them.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
antaur
@antaur.eth
ideally perma-lock into LP for real app coins cc: @dwr
0 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
wetsocks
@wetsocks.eth
adding LP would be huge imo, for example $runner is a v0 clanker with the same supply as $clanker the liq is so small on it, 850k market cap with only 120k in the LP (60k in ETH, 73k in native token)
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Matt
@mattlee
Adding to lp is interesting
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions