Njal on Farcaster

Content pfp

https://warpcast.com/~/channel/farcasterunion

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Njal pfp

Is the new spam labelling system then the old one? Let's first dive into the figures of active FIDS in the last 21 days: Label | old system | new system 0 | 87,945 | 82,379 1 | 22,508 | 0 2 | 26,002 | 59,695 no label | 14,912 | 9,293 Total | 151,367 | 147,897 I don't know where the difference in total active FIDs, between the two datasets came from, tbh. Interestingly: - with the new dataset there are 3,470 active FIDs missing(?) I dive into that when I have time. - the change was only in favour of spam label 2. - Disappearance of label 1 suggest that all outcomes of the system are (considered) valid. - Less no labels suggest that they need less data, so the outcome of the LLM seems to have stronger signals.

4 replies

1 recast

9 reactions

Njal pfp

So, is it better? Not necessary. If you're building a system where all outcomes pass a validation test, it doesn't mean that the judgement of the system is better. Besides that, there could be management motives to keep the number of spam label 2s as high as possible: - investors would value the company/project higher (happy investors are important!) - more happy casters happy with a label 2 of course, there needs to be a balance with people getting annoyed with label 2 casters who they consider as spam.

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Pichi pfp

https://farcaster.xyz/mvr/0x9777c49b He did pull some numbers. I didn’t add them.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Pichi pfp

@mvr I know you’ve looked at this extensively and have your own numbers. Any insight?

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Zero ᶠᶜ⁰.ᵇᵃˢᵉ pfp

Zero ᶠᶜ⁰.ᵇᵃˢᵉ

98 $degen 16👏

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction