Njal (cryptonjal)

collected "Toxic Heritage: Neon Cleanse" by @tornado- on @kismet

• 5 replies
• 15 recasts
• 23 reactions

Challenged myself to make a Farcaster social credit system myself, but sufficiently transparent, and 100% on Dune with available data on Dune + spam labels. I call it "Caster Credibility Score" Calculation is based on: - Activity - Interaction - Network - Engagement - Sustainability of activity over time - Spam label It ranks from 0 till 100. If you're not on the list, you scored 0. And to be clear, this says nothing about the quality of someone's casts. But the value that a caster brings to the Farcaster network. The Dune script: https://dune.com/queries/5497120

• 18 replies
• 9 recasts
• 24 reactions

The Warplets, the figures A study into the percentage of farmers who have made a profit from this great NFT project. And recommendations for gate keeping to limit farming. Due to its unexpected success, it has become an interesting research project to arm ourselves against farming! https://paragraph.com/@cryptonjal/the-warplets-the-farm-figures @sayangel

• 7 replies
• 4 recasts
• 22 reactions

For who is interested, a Dune query for the FID Punks mint: https://dune.com/queries/6180094/9867218 So far: - 2,921 mints by spam label 2 (70.0%), - 320 mints by no spam label (7.7%), - 933 mints by spam label 0 (22.4%), - 52 dubious casters detected from my dataset, - 0 took a 30 days Pro subscription between start mint and minting. - 346 took a 365 days Pro subscription between start mint and minting. Farming starts as soon as the standard is lowered. Interestingly enough, farmers contribute to the success, but they also have an interest in normal minters to propagate the success. In that respect, farming seems to be in proportion to what normal minters mint. @streetphoto

• 4 replies
• 2 recasts
• 16 reactions