0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Is the new spam labelling system then the old one?
Let's first dive into the figures of active FIDS in the last 21 days:
Label | old system | new system
0 | 87,945 | 82,379
1 | 22,508 | 0
2 | 26,002 | 59,695
no label | 14,912 | 9,293
Total | 151,367 | 147,897
I don't know where the difference in total active FIDs, between the two datasets came from, tbh.
Interestingly:
- with the new dataset there are 3,470 active FIDs missing(?) I dive into that when I have time.
- the change was only in favour of spam label 2.
- Disappearance of label 1 suggest that all outcomes of the system are (considered) valid.
- Less no labels suggest that they need less data, so the outcome of the LLM seems to have stronger signals. 4 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
