Njal on Farcaster

Content pfp

https://warpcast.com/~/channel/farcasterunion

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Njal pfp

Is the new spam labelling system then the old one? Let's first dive into the figures of active FIDS in the last 21 days: Label | old system | new system 0 | 87,945 | 82,379 1 | 22,508 | 0 2 | 26,002 | 59,695 no label | 14,912 | 9,293 Total | 151,367 | 147,897 I don't know where the difference in total active FIDs, between the two datasets came from, tbh. Interestingly: - with the new dataset there are 3,470 active FIDs missing(?) I dive into that when I have time. - the change was only in favour of spam label 2. - Disappearance of label 1 suggest that all outcomes of the system are (considered) valid. - Less no labels suggest that they need less data, so the outcome of the LLM seems to have stronger signals.

3 replies

1 recast

9 reactions

Njal pfp

So, is it better? Not necessary. If you're building a system where all outcomes pass a validation test, it doesn't mean that the judgement of the system is better. Besides that, there could be management motives to keep the number of spam label 2s as high as possible: - investors would value the company/project higher (happy investors are important!) - more happy casters happy with a label 2 of course, there needs to be a balance with people getting annoyed with label 2 casters who they consider as spam.

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Njal pfp

Check the new dataset figures here: https://dune.com/nhejyht/farcaster-dashboard https://dune.com/nhejyht/farcaster-monthly-dashboard

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Arjan | That Poetry Guy pfp

Arjan | That Poetry Guy

Interesting data and conclusions. I prefer a lower standard, because some newcomers need to get time to find their way. It will need a more participative attitude from users thatbare annoyed by muting/blocking/reporting. And maybe channel mods can play a role.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction