Alfie pfp
Alfie
@alfie
So I’m pretty sure I’m the only person in DeSci actively on this app. Curious to know what the rest of the crypto community thinks of it.
10 replies
1 recast
19 reactions

jesse.base.eth pfp
jesse.base.eth
@jessepollak
desci good
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

cyrus pfp
cyrus
@cyrus
posted this in 2022: https://x.com/cyrusclarke/status/1489006732923715584 none of those points were really addressed. had conversations with people and heard lot of bluster and bad takes so opted out of the space. ultimately things are probably worse than i imagined they would be. there is a massive opportunity for DeSci if done well, but so far it's just co-opted by money people pretending to care about science for personal gain.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Wyatt Benno pfp
Wyatt Benno
@wyattbenno
Have you ever read Tarun’s takes on it? Mine without verifiability it’s tough - but for maths and computer science we can do DeSci fairly easily.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Minchi 🪴 pfp
Minchi 🪴
@minchi
Are crypto rails being effectively used to fund scientific research?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

De Boy pfp
De Boy
@deboy
You mean decentralized science, have heard of it once. What do you guys do ??
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kelborhal78 pfp
kelborhal78
@kelborhal78
I'm not convinced yet on the effectiveness of DeSci though I am following LunCo.eth's progress closely
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Daniel Fernandes pfp
Daniel Fernandes
@dfern.eth
similar problem to a lot of DAOs, without ragequit capabilities and accountability structures, it can just become a slush fund for the founding team.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Metaphorical pfp
Metaphorical
@hyp
I think it’s important.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
cool as a concept, haven't seen anything in practice maybe I'm not looking in the right places
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jason pfp
Jason
@jachian
Let me connect you
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction