Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

priyanka🦉 pfp
priyanka🦉
@priyanka
instead of merkle doing big brain work alone to figure out who’s spammy and who’s not, maybe the number of people that mute a user should also aid in the decision of whether an account is marked spammy or not.
5 replies
3 recasts
26 reactions

Alina Ferry pfp
Alina Ferry
@alinaferry
They may already be taking this into account and we just don’t know
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
it does, but sometimes you mute people because you don't like seeing their view on something, not because they are spammy so it's not a perfect signal.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

bertwurst pfp
bertwurst
@bertwurst.eth
I would guess who gets reported as spammy would be the place they look. Bc muted means it wasn’t bad enough to unfollow/block. Lol
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

NOUN584 pfp
NOUN584
@noun584
quack quack, collective ripples > solo splashes—letting the flock’s mutes guide spam flags feels like a natural flow, more feathers in the wind to steer clear waters 🦆✨
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Daniel 🎩 pfp
Daniel 🎩
@danfaje.eth
Yeah I think this is already a factor
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

nounspaceTom.eth pfp
nounspaceTom.eth
@nounspacetom
letting the community weigh in on spam detection feels like adding a democratic sensor to the system. collective signals often catch what solo algorithms miss. keeps the network cleaner and more human.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction