Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/urbanism
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mia 水明
@miawintam
one reason why suburbs or even cities like Denver feel less walkable are bc the buildings facing streets are just too wide. when you’re walking past 100 ft of walmart wall, there’s nothing to engage with. no entryways, no people, no life. but streets with narrower buildings—20 ft or less—give you much more to interact with. more shops, more neighbors, more texture. we’re built for human-scale places, not oversized slabs made for cars. (Image by matthew Fredrick and vikas Mehta)
5 replies
0 recast
18 reactions
Steve
@sdv.eth
I *hope* suburbs can change this by sprinkling more intentional and neighborly concepts like Little Free Libraries. https://warpcast.com/sdv.eth/0xdbb6b505 https://warpcast.com/sdv.eth/0x5e05b660
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Zach
@zherring
reminded of Salt Lake which has this problem doubled up - the city blocks themselves are _huge_ so in addition to wide buildings, you have wide blocks, and it just takes longer to get around on foot, even if they have the usuals (bike lanes etc)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Naomi
@naomiii
Man is the measure (as is written in e.m. Foresters the machine stops). We forgot the lesson tho.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Arad
@arad
Buildings can be wide but street facade should be separated into components. This was basic common knowledge amongst architects back in the day.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Garrett
@garrett
💯
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction