Brian Flynn
@flynn.eth
Bringing stocks onchain is like bringing newspaper online. A skeuomorphic transition that ultimately is surpassed by something more native online newspapers --> social media tokenized stocks --> ???
9 replies
1 recast
34 reactions
Kaito Cunningham
@kaitocunningham
How do you think about this with stablecoins?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
JR ↑
@juli
I agree, totally think it can be valuable to have a programmable asset and incentivize stakeholders with new tools but shareholder structure, typical mediums, traditional business models are very strong and in place. Much more room for exploration, onchain capital formation, new structures, new business models, new stakeholder relationships when started onchain.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Vinay Débrou ⚙️
@vinaydebrou.eth
one direction is more community investing like Roam did earlier https://balajis.com/p/mirrortable
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
sardius.eth
@sardius
It’s a good question, I think we see a lot of the onchain capital allocation mechanisms get applied more and more to markets on and offchain, as finance is further democratized and decentralized. The tokens and liquidity matter, along with novel onchain allocation mechanisms that are seamless and easy to use for networks of different sizes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
S·G 🎩↑🙂
@esdotge
DeFi
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ron |Researcher
@ronbinhod
🔥 Great analogy. Just like social media didn’t just digitize newspapers but reinvented communication, onchain assets will go far beyond tokenized stocks. We’ll see truly native financial primitives emerge.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1frog9
@1frog9
tokenized ai brokers or w/e
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
FinanceQ8
@financeq8
social finance
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
max ↑
@baseddesigner.eth
memecoins exactly
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
