Dan Romero on Farcaster

Content pfp

https://warpcast.com/~/channel/politics

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp

69 of the 100 wealthiest congressional districts are now represented by Democrats.

8 replies

10 recasts

90 reactions

Metaphorical pfp

Shocking that Democrats would represent urban areas.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gFam.live (UrbanGladiator) pfp

gFam.live (UrbanGladiator)

Another way to look at this is that Republicans managed to shrink (or chase away) earnings for their constituents in just 15 years.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

ʞɔɐſ pfp

@farcasterjack.eth

this is bc of education level. not saying that they vote dem bc they’re smarter necessarily , but when it comes to bias academia mostly leans (lurches) to the left. That education system produces liberal adults who get paid more of their education level. I will also say that IMO establishment democrats are at the whim of their wealthy constituents/donors just like republicans. It doesn’t surprise me that the wealthy often vote for dems. The rich will tend towards voting for whoever best protects and grows their specific financial interests. These days, Dems seem to meet that criteria better than Republicans in many situations. They cause less chaos, they uphold the status quo, they lie more effectively. Makes sense to back dems. Not saying this is a fact but all of this is just the way I see it. IMO this stat makes perfect sense these days, all things considered .

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

aferg pfp

Reading about this sort of stuff in Sandel’s Tyranny of Merit at the moment

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

tyler ↑ pfp

That’s a wild shift in a relatively short amount of time.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

nomygod pfp

why are they the only party trying to tax them ?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Eberhard Gil pfp

related https://farcaster.xyz/azbest/0x85b3d4fe

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Ran Domero pfp

@randomerror.eth

coincidence? i don’t think so

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction