Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
"Should we rename Warpcast to Farcaster?" https://x.com/Jake_Stott/status/1910254505943347519
63 replies
13 recasts
198 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x7d0c8109
3 replies
1 recast
39 reactions

JAKE pfp
JAKE
@jake
If you were to name it now. If it had no current name or history. What would you name it?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡 pfp
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
Why not deprecate “warps” the whole way?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

𝑶𝒕𝒕𝒊🗿✨ pfp
𝑶𝒕𝒕𝒊🗿✨
@toyboy.eth
It always was… farcaster.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

July pfp
July
@july
Yes
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

seb pfp
seb
@seb
Yes, no brainer
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

hish 🏴‍☠️ pfp
hish 🏴‍☠️
@hish
My vote, back to Farcaster. Stronger brand imho Many times I find myself typing Farcaster in mobile or browser
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

deep substrate foliated tomato pfp
deep substrate foliated tomato
@tomato.eth
Call it frcstr.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ʞɔɐſ pfp
ʞɔɐſ
@farcasterjack.eth
the question is not if, but when
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ninja Dev pfp
Ninja Dev
@ninja-dev
Yes. No questions asked. Farcaster wins.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thibauld pfp
Thibauld
@thibauld
Inevitable
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

𓇶 pfp
𓇶
@nebula
Also the logo could be the iconic arch
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

𓇶 pfp
𓇶
@nebula
Yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nicholas Charriere pfp
Nicholas Charriere
@pushix
Yes. One brand is better than 2 for obvious reasons! Also the name farcaster rocks
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

britt pfp
britt
@brittkim.eth
yes, but not because that dude arbitrarily used 100x.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Bethany Crystal pfp
Bethany Crystal
@bethanymarz
+1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Alex pfp
Alex
@alex-gedevani
yes pls
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

seneca pfp
seneca
@seneca
are the potential protocol<>product repercussions down the line the main worry?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Apex777.eth pfp
Apex777.eth
@apex777.eth
10000000%
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction