Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Rewards Algo Update We're also updating the rewards algo this week We're no longer going to count deleted casts, reactions, recasts or replies. This means in some cases, people will see scores go down mid-week. We're also making a few other tweaks. Change will roll out later today. The algo is never going to be perfect, but the goal is to reward high signal top-level content on the network—from anyone!
54 replies
140 recasts
971 reactions
Darryl Yeo 🛠️
@darrylyeo
Were replies and quote casts always counted before this? Thought only top-level casts counted hence the /quotecastguys meta.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Replies - not counted Quote casts - top-level cast, so counted We may nerf quote casts a bit or pass through engagement to the original posted in a future update.
5 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
To be clear: inbound replies to your casts count for your engagement / score. Replies you leave for others do not count for your score.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Ramsey 🎩🤝
@ramsey
Replies not counted is kind of a bummer. I always felt like it is the best "metric" of engagement on a cast, and I like replying to the content I like. Also, I always felt like I was contributing to someones score if we talked on a certain reply extensively (not that that was the reason for the convo, just sayin').
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Pichi
@pichi
Many accounts are only quote casting. It feels like mostly quote casts should not count.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mr. Wildenfree 🐺🍵🎵
@mrwildenfree
Pass through engagement on QC’s is optimal & reduces the incentive to do it rather than just replying to folks — so works for me. Could also be happy with a split ratio of the points on QC’s, like 75 : 25, Original Caster : Quote Caster
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
proyanka 🦉
@priyanka
big yes to passing through engagement to the op https://farcaster.xyz/priyanka/0xac925eb7
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction