Content pfp
Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/art-664
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DCinvestor pfp
DCinvestor
@dcinvestor
if people very steeped in art say "sorry, that is not art" you should pay attention, because it is triggering enough that it made them defensive imo, art is about intent (did the creator make this to try and make someone feel something?) it is not about reception
67 replies
14 recasts
131 reactions
totty 🔥🧶 pfp
totty 🔥🧶
@totty.eth
tangentially reminds me of this post would’ve fetched a decent amount of efferium if it was minted by the artist https://x.com/donnelvillager/status/1741394747594318275?s=46&t=tAxBMgOSal2NAaHhgUOx5g
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Zak pfp
Zak
@zakkrevitt.eth
Art is absolutely about intent! I'm passionate about that idea.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
This gives me the sense of grace.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kaito pfp
kaito
@kaito
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ashira 🎨👏🎩 pfp
Ashira 🎨👏🎩
@ashira
Art is about intent however I’m wary of people who say “that’s not art”. From what I’ve seen in my decades as an artist, & as someone who’s been part of quite a few subcultures, those who say that tend to be very narrow in their perception of what art is, often excluding many legitimate artists as a result
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ashira 🎨👏🎩 pfp
Ashira 🎨👏🎩
@ashira
Art is about intent however I’m wary of people who say “that’s not art”. From what I’ve seen in my decades as an artist, & as someone who’s been part of quite a few subcultures, those who say that tend to be very narrow in their perception of what art is, often excluding many legitimate artists as a result
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
@risk pfp
@risk
@risk
I guess shitposting is art, because you're trying to elicit an emotional response - however low quality a bar it sets. Is it then reasonable to say that its reception has nothing to do with whether it can be defined as art? Doesn't this in some way prohibit art from evolving?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Father Abraham pfp
Father Abraham
@father-abraham
I have an art degree, and this is exactly what they told us art is in school!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
apocalypse art pfp
apocalypse art
@apocalypseart
imo art is definitely also about reception & not only intent wonderful artworks that no one but the artists sees do not become “art”; they remain his private journals Speaking from 30 years of experience ser The circle of creation completes itself (& starts again) when others see & appreciate the work my 2¢
5 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Laurence Fuller pfp
Laurence Fuller
@laurencefuller
The opposite is also true though, if art that’s steeped in art and those nose pickers say “that’s too art” then it’s probably good art 🥀🔥
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Arthemort pfp
Arthemort
@arthemort
Sometime it’s about not being complacent too
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rachel S T Wood 🎩 pfp
Rachel S T Wood 🎩
@rachelstwood
Artists make art from their emotions. Collectors collect art based on their own emotion. Making and selling and buying are three very different mindsets 😅
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LucaOnAdventure pfp
LucaOnAdventure
@lucaonadventure.eth
Just to try and understand, as I am passionate about people’s definition and concept of art - do you think unintentional creations can’t be art? Just to clarify my position, I think art is either everything or nothing. No definition has ever satisfied me.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
🎩 MxVoid 🎩 pfp
🎩 MxVoid 🎩
@mxvoid
My personal definition of “art” (an admittedly loose and inclusive definition, YMMV): Anything that requires some kind of agency, volition, or judgement, where the agent turns around and says, “this is art.” This definition includes Dada, conceptual art, found object art, memes, shitposts, and, yes, AI art.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mirs (amir motlagh) pfp
Mirs (amir motlagh)
@mirs
there is an academic understanding of art (which is fluid yet time-bound) & there is a popular understanding of art (which is less fluid yet easy to understand) from my experience, what triggers the former is the looseness & ease of labeling w/o distinctions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jesus.eth pfp
jesus.eth
@jesusdoteth
Amen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ѳ𝓇 pfp
Ѳ𝓇
@0r
the intent is enough to make an assertation that something is art, but does it mean it is art just because of that? I'd say No. It's not really important, time will tell, but there is often great discourse when you exclude things and or fight for something to be included than when you just say everything already is.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mirs (amir motlagh) pfp
Mirs (amir motlagh)
@mirs
there is an academic understanding of art (which is fluid yet time-bound) & there is a popular understanding of art (which is less fluid yet easy to understand) from my experience, what triggers the former is the looseness & ease of labeling w/o distinctions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DT pfp
DT
@decentral-think
I think Duchamp's urinal is perhaps one of the best representations of your point. The essence is conveyed in your message, Bravo 👌 🧠
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction