I feel like things would be a lot better if we knew who owned each wallet (each person could still have multiple)

/new-york 🗽 • /untzuntz 😈 • /tastebuds 🍕 Fan of eating tacos and bringing people together, often at the same time 🌮

j-hn.info | founder at /beings-club | experimenting with /higher

I think privacy is important but anon addresses are also a double-edged sword that create more harm than good imo

📷 + Channel Owner /nature | Go-To-Market and Service Design Sprint Master /distribution

I agree! Been thinking that since 2021 for a number of reasons. Since I joined Warpcast, I've really been thinking about that because of the trust issue and how that impacts our interactions on this platform.

In general I think it would be useful if every wallet were tied to a known entity

When you say this, do you mean specifically on Farcaster?

Stay Curious // iixii // Head of Crypto at https://www.lazertechnologies.com/  // Prev: CoinDesk, Roc Nation // based @basedevo

ENS missed an opportunity to take advantage of their incentive 

They should’ve incentivized people to attest more information to their ENS profile which would’ve made the ENS protocol more valuable and sustainable

interesting point

i always thought ens’s promise was “atleast 1” wallet solution 

but you have a good point!

it’s hard to ask for emails to crypto-natives, imagine doxxing their wallets

why do you think things would be better?