Zinger
@zinger
On a serious note I do think mini apps will eventually have to be rebranded to a better (ideally monosyllabic) name "mini" feels like it undersells them tbh since they're actually fully-functioning web apps with onchain superpowers
11 replies
0 recast
18 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
what does that solve?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gordie slater
@proxystudio.eth
hear me out “apps”
6 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
cody
@codyb.eth
main knock on frames (for me) is that it doesn't evoke notifications or more than a single view. mini apps do evoke that and I didn't start to give them much time of day until they did. I think they will just become apps but Farcaster might want to stay away from that language to prevent ban in App Store.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Antidote
@0xantidote.eth
Frames were a great name. I understannd why they rebranded it as mini app though cause it is the industry standard.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
lil itty bitty baby apps
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
shairaaa
@shairaaa
Fapps.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonas
@jmaaloe
“Mini apps” is as memorable and meaningful as it would’ve been for Twitter to call them “mini posts” instead of tweets
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
A rebrand feels inevitable especially as they get more robust and start carrying real user bases.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nuconomy.⌐◨-◨
@nuconomy.eth
Did you see that app on Farcaster? No, in the Warpcast app. Yes an app in an app. Well it’s kind of a mini-app. You should try it!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
terricola
@terricola.eth
eventually just "Apps"
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction