Content coins will work if you get people to post them with sufficient quantity and frequency.

Until then, there will be a lot of push back. But the only way through is posting more.

Swap "being cool" with "established coin norms" and "being cringe" with "creating more coins".

zero-sum games will always be cringe, no matter how many times you play them

If buying a single unit costs me $0.10, a large portion goes to the creator and I don't ever plan to sell because I'm happy with the memento, then it's not zero sum. 

Not saying that's the reality on the ground today, but it's possible that people shift their point of view.

does a large portion of every purchase go to the creator?

on Zora creators get 0.5% trading fee (plus token allocation which is only worth anything if the coin goes viral). so... no

investor, photographer, nomad, exploring onchain & exploring the 🌎

this is where it gets interesting

personally don’t view myself as a “content creator”, sometimes even have a hard time viewing myself as a photographer, but i’ve been grateful to get to know some super talented photographers here that have given me confidence to keep shooting - so i guess i fit more in the “artist” space

based on that, i just want a way to share my photos so they can live onchain in perpetuity, have them be collected, and capture most of the value

im newer to the scene in terms of publishing onchain, but have been able to gather some traction from my good friends on fc bc the social graph ports to rodeo - and i collect a bunch of art there too so i want the same for them

all that to say, i think the artist space craves some level of customization, and a higher value capture than what currently exists, i don’t think either of these asks are going away in the future

a few more thoughts from the art perspective: https://warpcast.com/eriks/0x695f25e2

Depends of the platform of course, but there are platforms that will pass 100% of the fees back to the creator by default.

*cough* @flaunch

im curious too about what the take rates are for existing platforms where art/content can be distributed

as it stands today it makes me want fc to win for a couple reasons

1. if someone created a public good custom nft/token tool - theoretically the creator could receive 99% of the value

2. fc being agnostic to which creator tools ppl use is the biggest factor, if fc doesn’t charge on economic activity here (or keeps it to less than 1%), i can see how creators can launch on any platform and distribute here, versus the main distribution source being elsewhere

fc staying neutral is important, i think the market will figure itself out w time