Content
@
https://www.optimism.io
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Varun Srinivasan
@v
I voted in Round 4 of Optimism's Retroactive Rewards yesterday. OP rewards people building on the superchain, and many of these rewards go to FC builders. It's one of the best implemented programs in crypto. It's also really cool to see that @farcaster data via @openrank is helping drive where the rewards go. My one critique for this round is I don't think voting by choosing a metric is a good idea in practice. Many of the options felt like they had very similar outcomes and the vote didn't really matter. I also was forced to reward some participants that I don't think are very good.
6 replies
3 recasts
35 reactions
Stas
@stas
Did you use the open source multiplier? Was it clearly communicated and executed?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Fractal Visions
@fractalvisions.eth
Nice 😊 way to grow the pie 🥧!!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
WebOfTrust
@weboftrust
On the plus side, on chain metrics remove debate of bias but I also share your opinions on forced reward. You have a presence in this ecosystem, would you mind sharing your thoughts on the forum. https://gov.optimism.io/t/retro-funding-4-voting-rationale-thread/8396
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jonassft
@jonassft
Appreciate the feedback @v! Would be great if you could post your voting rationale and take on the metrics here 🙏 https://gov.optimism.io/t/retro-funding-4-voting-rationale-thread/8396/8
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
chii-ka!
@chii-ka
Is there any reward based on open rank??
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mark 🎩
@web3withmark
How were you forced?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
