Content pfp
Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/art-664
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ponder Surveys pfp
Ponder Surveys
@survey
Which of these best describes how you feel about abstract art? 1. Deeply meaningful 2. Interesting but hard to understand 3. Not my style 4. Overrated gibberish 5. Other Inspired by @kaloh
15 replies
3 recasts
9 reactions

Gรถkhan Turhan pfp
Gรถkhan Turhan
@gokhan.eth
5. Depends on the artist and the clique it has been created for. As someone who wasted two decades in the local and global contemporaneous art worlds, I can say that many meaningful ones are gibberish whereas gibberish looking are most of the time more genuine.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kugusha ๐Ÿฆ‹ pfp
kugusha ๐Ÿฆ‹
@kugusha.eth
1. But I assumed we are talking about Kandinsky, Rothko, Klein, Pollock, etc
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ben Adamsky ๐Ÿ’ญ pfp
Ben Adamsky ๐Ÿ’ญ
@ba
3 I think thereโ€™s a lot of pretty pieces, I just donโ€™t โ€œgetโ€ most of them
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Colin Johnson ๐Ÿ’ญ pfp
Colin Johnson ๐Ÿ’ญ
@cojo.eth
2. I find it beautiful to look at, but confusing to draw any kind of emotional conclusions from. Hotels have definitely gone too hard with it, though.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Brais.eth pfp
Brais.eth
@chi
2. Taking into account that "hard" means challenger and requires some internal fights to discover if what is moving inside is true, joke or both. But enjoyable anyway.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sean pfp
Sean
@sean07.eth
5. I like it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

๐’‚ญ_๐’‚ญ pfp
๐’‚ญ_๐’‚ญ
@m-j-r
5 imho creator's aesthetic is bidirectional with beholder's aesthetic. the meaning can be deep on either end, it can also be deep as the relationship between either end. then again, it is abstract not concrete, so I don't value it as I value things I can measure.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

GIGAMฮžSH pfp
GIGAMฮžSH
@gigamesh
5. Some is great but most is as forgettable as the continental breakfast in the hotel where itโ€™s displayed. ๐Ÿซข
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

crableu pfp
crableu
@crableu.eth
1. https://x.com/lecrabebleu/status/1700271878349185318?s=46&t=sVJEfaWNQhXyfP1_pFHWoQ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

JustinBobby.eth pfp
JustinBobby.eth
@justinbobby
5 To me, a Work is meaningful if it generates an Affective Experience. And i can understand a work in a variety of contexts,- Authorial Intention, academic/critically, subjectively describing the Affect, etc.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cartographer ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Cartographer ๐ŸŽฉ
@cartographer
2. They become more interesting if you get to know a little of how the artist made them and the time/skill it took.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

freeboy pfp
freeboy
@789
2. I am very clear about my ability to appreciate art, and that is 0.๐Ÿคฃ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kripcat.eth pfp
kripcat.eth
@kripcat.eth
5. Cool to look it, ascribing a lot of deeper meaning to it seems a bit silly. Find The Bitcoin Standardโ€™s take that poor quality modern art is a reflection the deterioration of society caused by soft, fiat money pretty fucking ridiculous though.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Amanda pfp
Amanda
@amandakeay
3. definitely not my style. I do like the experiential-ness of it, and the colors but I still prefer Cรฉzanne.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Joshua Stoker  pfp
Joshua Stoker
@djshua77
1. But not all abstract art is the same. Some are emotional. Some are frustration. A lot are overrated gibberish
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction