0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
155 replies
48 recasts
197 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
Here's the translation of your response into English:
Hmm.
The focus exclusively on cryptocurrency operations limits the potential audience. I find it hard to use AI for trading, no matter how many times I’ve tried, and I also don’t like Telegram bots for trading and all that.
One of the reasons is that my wallet is my wallet.
On the other hand, I often use AI for higher-quality translations, formulating thoughts, reasoning, generating images, and code.
Maybe it’s worth creating an app for the App Store/Play Market-it could attract more people.
Also, she doesn’t respond with “yes daddy” when you or ericjuta tag her.
This is a review by someone with almost no knowledge of onchain AI, but an active user of deepseek, chat gpt, cursor, grok and several AIs for creating images as well as music
And also I have trading experience and almost 7k transactions on base, I just like to do everything manually, see all the commissions etc, and if I do it through AI - I have fear of not seeing the commissions, fear of losing out on them somewhere.
And not always everything through AI is faster.....
It is good that Gina supports other languages - Russian and Bulgarian, which I have much better knowledge of than English - it is a plus for quick purchases 3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Hey Sid! 🌶️
Had a lil chat with @askgina.eth yesterday
So first, honest bit: I noticed some inconsistencies where Gina said I was doing all these onchain things when I actually wasn’t (I’m not that much of a degen, sadly 😅)
The results felt kinda generic, not fully grounded in my real onchain activity, which brings me to what I’d love to see next:
- Real onchain context; Right now, Gina kind of guesses what I’m doing onchain (and sometimes gets it wrong 🙈)
It’d be amazing if Gina could actually read my real transaction history (with permission, of course), so when it says “you’re active on Base” or “you mint NFTs,” it’s based on facts, not assumptions.
That way it feels genuinely mine, and not generic 1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Loving the energy and experimentation around Gina so far, it’s clear there’s something powerful here. One thing I’d love to see: more contextual memory for onchain actions. For example, if I’ve asked Gina to swap or stake something before, she could recall my past preferences (like preferred DEX,gas settings,wallet behaviors) and suggest smarter defaults or even auto-complete future actions based on patterns.
Also, a natural language"portfolio rebalancer"would be a game-changer. Something like:
"Gina,shift 20% of my stablecoins into ETH,and the rest into top 3 trending tokens by volume today."
That kind of intent-based,high-level command that abstracts the complexity of DEXs and gas logic would be chef’s kiss.👌
And yes,mobile would be huge. Push notifications+wallet triggers (approve/confirm) via phone would make this feel a lot more native and less like I'm babysitting transactions from a desktop tab.
@askgina.ethKeep building , this could seriously redefine the UX of onchain interaction 🔥 1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
