SwarthyHatter

@swarthyhatter

94 Following

10 Followers

SwarthyHatter pfp

Looking to pick up a few more /gnars but not a fan of the SawHead. Anyone else want this one ? https://nouns.build/dao/base/0x880fb3cf5c6cc2d7dfc13a993e839a9411200c17/6793

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

@rdubb you haven’t even staked into the DAO , what do you mean “active founders” I have been participating in this project since day one. Secondly , the founder shovel tokens were intended to be distributed to the first 12 unique individuals to purchase a City Noun . That seems to be the case but I’ll have to recheck the addresses. Regardless , it is an interim solution much preferable to a hand selected committee . You continually try to dismiss valid concerns as petty and contrived but I believe the facts speak for themselves.

3 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

Its all onchain 🔗🔗🔗🔗 The die are cast 🎲🎲🎲🎲 Let's all hold hands and pray 🙏🙏🙏🙏

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

Happy Juneteenth everyone ! We can’t wait to celebrating and protesting with you all in the streets.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

I mean we haven't even been able to address other red flags yet. Like the use of @zamees wallet being used to settle and and start DAO auctions rather than the DAO safe. Like this shizzz is cray cray and not OK. If prop 10 doesn't pass , we have no recourse for addressing all of the other problems an audit is sure to illuminate.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

I’d be remiss not to clearly state this: the issue with Prop 10 is not a personal dispute — it’s about potential Sybil activity tied to the Gnosis Safe. Multiple parties believe a founder may control more than one signer wallet. That’s a serious red flag, and it wouldn’t even be a question if DAO process had been followed and Safe signers were approved through a public proposal and vote. What makes this even more concerning is the precedent set in Props 8 and 9 — both of which consolidated decision-making authority without broader consent. We’re now looking at a compounding pattern of centralization and process bypassing. If we care about the integrity of City Nouns governance, this vote matters. Time to summon the vote. @metamu @civilmonkey @zaal @scottrepreneur.eth @oceanandsea @failoften @hildabroom @digitaldreams @fattybuthappy https://nouns.build/dao/base/0xdf4f168ba41c88ab4d0f1e2117110600c7e44b6d/vote/10?tab=votes

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

Really sort of sus to put a set of major props through on a Friday knowing it expires on a holiday. Thank golly someone got a counter prop up in time to avoid this abhorrent veto power. Why such a short window ? (2days) Because the founder safe used City Noun #0 to vote the window shorter before even more than 4 voting tokens could sell. Despite the fact that Buildr had stipulated a longer voting window when funding City Nouns. Not against any rules, but not necessarily good faith action either. Seems like there has been a lot of less than good faith action in the short time since launch, beginning with props 1 & 2. Prop 1 used City Noun #0 to aridrop 2 tokens each to 3 founders, and a prop to shorten the voting goes up before enough votes to counter are sold. So far the prop history is starting to read like a classic attempt for some founders to capture the DAO early while creating the illusion of decentralization. The suspect Sybil activity certainly doesn't help.

1 reply

1 recast

2 reactions

SwarthyHatter pfp

SO /nouns and /citynouns members with a love of decentralization to help review and audit the recent activity surrounding the launch of City Nouns. https://nouns.build/dao/base/0xdf4f168ba41c88ab4d0f1e2117110600c7e44b6d/vote/10

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

Just now noticing that even the description of this channel tries to claim personal ownership and exclusive founder status for @zamees and @rdubb How is that the case when @digitaldreams was on the original proposal and I was participating in foundational discussions before the auction was live ? Do we need to define Decentralized & Autonomous for those in the back ? I think a DAOs community page should be more concerned with spreading the vision and values than on claiming personal ownership. Starting to consider posting the correspondences I have been given to context all of this for everyone.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

I am incredibly excited to see Prop 10 up just in time to skirt the abhorrent veto power recently granted to the interim Council by props 8 & 9. @metamu @hildabroom @civilmonkey @scottrepreneur.eth @oceanandsea @digitaldreams @fattybuthappy @zaal Please take the time to read through props 8 & 9’as well as the objections noted in the votes . Prop 10 goes live for voting in 8 hours and we need every vote to right this ship :) https://nouns.build/dao/base/0xdf4f168ba41c88ab4d0f1e2117110600c7e44b6d/vote/10

1 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

I am incredibly excited to see Prop 10 up just in time to skirt the abhorrent veto power recently granted to the interim Council by props 8 & 9. @metamu @hildabroom @civilmonkey @scottrepreneur.eth @oceanandsea @digitaldreams @fattybuthappy @zaal Please take the time to read through props 8 & 9’as well as the objections noted in the votes . Prop 10 goes live for voting in 8 hours and we need every vote to right this ship :)

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

Days have passed since @rdubb and @zamees voted their own props through without building DAO consensus. A set of props that grant unrestricted centralized authority to guess who !? Themselves !! And yet we have yet to hear from either of them in the discord or in response to our farcaster posts. Makes me feel it was no accident the prop was posted and resolved over father’s day weekend . SMH. Are you guys stuck in traffic or wearing your snail shoes ?

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

I'm really begging to be concerned. You claim to be nominating those contributing to the foundation of a truly authentic DAO , yet both of the people you appointed ( without DAO Consensus ) , had no idea of your intention to appointed them to the City Council until after they were officially announced !! One of them refused the position, as they had never intended to be so involved at the early stages. And another has recently stated in public forum to being removed from the project and unaware of anything that is currently going on in the DAOs formation.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

Does anyone else think it is strange and perhaps a bit ominous that 5 of the 7 wallets that voted yes on prop 8&9 have either received their tokens from @zamees , have been funded by him , or are associated with his ENS ? Ever since the removal of co-founder @digitaldreams and the subsequent cancelling of her proposal I have been watching very closely. Ask me what I've seen. @metamu @civilmonkey @hildabroom @fattybuthappy @scottrepreneur.eth @nounishprof

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

SwarthyHatter pfp

After careful review, I’m voting NO on this proposal—not due to disagreement with its intent, but because its structure is premature, its assumptions unratified, and its language poses risks for a decentralized governance system still establishing its legitimacy. Reasons for NO: 1. Council Legitimacy: The proposal derives authority from a governance framework that lacks broad endorsement, making it difficult to accept ethical enforcement powers based on an unratified body. https://nouns.build/dao/base/0xdf4f168ba41c88ab4d0f1e2117110600c7e44b6d/54?tab=activity

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

Joining the @gnars fam feels niceeeee

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

CITY NOUNS TOWN HALL IN PROGRESS>> JOIN THE FAM Weekly Community Call starting in the discord Meeting Room now: https://discord.gg/TJQpXJ9g

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

This shit in Los Angeles is getting crazy. The violence is being way overblown, the police brutality is all time ripe , and now 700 marines ? How many more days until a soldier kills a civilian ? This is not for us.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

A lil double rainbow for our lil city nouns soft launch.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp

Checking the event RSVPs for Todays /citynouns denver soft launch party and one of the guests has a special Dietary restriction. I'm dead. This is the art for me.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction