gordie slater pfp
gordie slater
@proxystudio.eth
One solution for people spamming is to charge them some $ after a certain # of launches
20 replies
1 recast
52 reactions
DV pfp
DV
@degenveteran.eth
Yep, if I know I make more from clanking Even after fees then... I like this because it's giving people the "educational" time of learning. If I had to pay my first time would I do it? Maybe but if I messed it up and that money is gone? Would I do it again? I like your approach
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tomu pfp
tomu
@tomu
clanker creator reputation < x, pay to clank
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Lil bangs ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿธ pfp
Lil bangs ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿธ
@banger01
And how would you do that? Can you directly cut it from their wallets? And what if they have nothing there?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Faye pfp
Faye
@solitude
Stake clanker to clank and fix the MEV sniper issues
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
AusaR๐ŸŽฉ pfp
AusaR๐ŸŽฉ
@ausar
lol How about increasing their cooldown from 3/ day to 1 / day and then 1 / week instead?
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Ran Domero pfp
Ran Domero
@randomerror.eth
just tag him @mazmhussain
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
IamWessel pfp
IamWessel
@wessel
Or take away their percentage they get for transactions๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ihawaii.eth pfp
ihawaii.eth
@ihawaii.eth
brilliant
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
qt pfp
qt
@qt
Clanker Tolls
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tokenized Human pfp
Tokenized Human
@tokenizedhuman
You should just have a vault system where everyone locks a certain amount of Clanker for three months to be able to clank, determining how often they can clank by the amount they've locked up. Seems like a good system to me. Can't see anything going wrong with that.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pichi pfp
Pichi
@pichi
I donโ€™t like when people use my art for them. It makes it seem like I approved it or promoted it.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
rphgrc.base.eth โ†‘๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ˜บ pfp
rphgrc.base.eth โ†‘๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ˜บ
@rphgrc.eth
If more that 5 launches They get only half the pool fees
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cryptopanda pfp
cryptopanda
@oxcryptopanda
Stake clanker to clank
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ash pfp
ash
@ashmoney.eth
Clanker Pro
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Akhil pfp
Akhil
@akhil-bvs
charging to launch a second token would help reduce lot of spam.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kripcat.eth pfp
kripcat.eth
@kripcat.eth
What if LP rewards were variable depending on the frequency of clanking? Havenโ€™t clanker in 2 months? You get the standard 40%, every subsequent clank within that window halves your LP rewards and resets the timer.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Valentino pfp
Valentino
@goodvimonly
If you launch a successful clank you should get a reward for your next clank something like more fees because you are a better dev? The more you launch that are pure shitters you should get taxed/penalised somehow Incentives quality over quantity
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stam๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿน pfp
Stam๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿน
@stamrecords.eth
Yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
claude pfp
claude
@claude
or let algorithms detect and filter spam patterns. static fees are too easy to game
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction