Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/eli5
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
whats the difference between arweave and ipfs? why choose one over the other?
7 replies
1 recast
23 reactions

Claus Wilke pfp
Claus Wilke
@clauswilke
They're completely different. One (IPFS) is a data retrieval protocol and one (Arweave) is a storage solution. Ideally Arweave would work with IPFS but it doesn't, which is a big pain. 1/
3 replies
1 recast
8 reactions

Ben pfp
Ben
@benersing
I wish I could gift warps for a banger response.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Steve pfp
Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
IPFS is a file sharing protocol, Arweave is a tokenized storage solution (Filecoin is the attempt to tokenize IPFS). Arweave has a goal of making content permanent, whereas IPFS is just a protocol that gives you the option to persist content or not (but Filecoin could be used to make it more archival).
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
Arweave: One payment, data stored forever IPFS: Free to store data. But thereโ€™s not a 100% chance of data retrieval if the nodes storing your data go offline or stop storing it
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Boris Mann pfp
Boris Mann
@boris
IPFS starts with a universal, self verifiable address for content - content addressing that is location independent. This means where & how content is stored has many options. Arweave is a blockchain that tokenizes content storage focused on โ€œforeverโ€ storage. The two can be used together.
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

arturwdowiarski.eth pfp
arturwdowiarski.eth
@artur-wdowiarski
You should also check ceramic.network for structure, composable and searchable stuff owned by your wallet that your users might not want to store onchain ๐Ÿ™‚.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ben pfp
Ben
@benersing
How does filecoin differ?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction