Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

nicholas 🧨 pfp
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
Farcaster obsession with policing speech like one word replies is obnoxious. Approaching StackExchange levels of pedantry.
7 replies
1 recast
17 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Two options: 1. People change behavior 2. They get hidden by the algo and get frustrated. We’re trying 1. People with plenty of quality casts are fine to use the network however they like. It’s the accounts that are virtually entirely all low effort content.
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Pepo pfp
Pepo
@pepo
You made me remember Stack Overflow's founder talking about how their strict rules were *the* thing that made their platform successful, even if people complained :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZkYSSE8HHI
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
Nice
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ben pfp
Ben
@benersing
I hear your frustration. That said “policing” is an unfair characterization. If it were accurate this post wouldn't be getting as much engagement as it is.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

brian is live on unlonely pfp
brian is live on unlonely
@briang
retweeting not bc i endorse but bc i like this content
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kbc pfp
kbc
@kbc
What incentives can we create to nudge for quality interactions?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
In my understanding, and at the risk of adding to the pedantry: that’s not Farcaster, that’s Warpcast. Other FC apps may approach moderation differently and not penalize the visibility of repetitive one-word replies. But at the protocol level, they’re all equally visible.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction