octant

Hello /octant channel! I am self-nominating for the #farcasterrpgfspring2025 round for my work in channel and community building on Farcaster.

My largest channel is /itookaphoto. Sister Itooka channels: /itookaselfie /aitookaphoto and /itookavideo. I also run /moviesuggestions and /tvsuggestions 

Casts in my channels don't focus on tokens or even crypto, just great art or suggestions on the timeline!

One way I build community and support quality content on Farcaster is by sponsoring Rounds, @cura leaderboards & other contests with Degen & other coins. I've given away over 1mil degen this way (probably 4mil+ including tips). I plan to continue to support artists. You can see past rounds and contests on a linktree: https://linktr.ee/itooka

ITAP has been the number 1 channel on Farcaster for months  https://dune.com/ilemi/farcaster-explorer

Thanks to @octant and @tayyab for hosting a huge retrogrant round for Farcaster. Looks like lots of deserving folks are going to get rewarded!

Unfortunately, it looks like my entry below was disqualified. I am looking for feedback on why. 

With ITAP and other channels, I've tried to create spaces for anyone to contribute quality content to Farcaster - amateurs and professionals. Especially non-token related content.

Eng @superstate. Chasing curiosity. People, nature, machines. Hakuna matata, "Its a problem-free philosophy.”

Infra for growth. Sustainable funding for ecosystems, powered by DeFi. Jamming in /octant | discord.gg/octant

The revolution will be decentralized! Cast your shot /itookaphoto - /itookavideo - /moviesuggestions - /tvsuggestions - https://linktr.ee/inceptionally

That sucks. It seems I am in the same boat…

If you were DQ'd it was most likely if it was known shown direct impact to Farcaster, ask for future work, or were primarily built around channels. We explicitly were not supporting channels under the retroPGF umbrella. 

Documented here:

collaboration /ottp +AI /luminous +creativity /arrow ->  /luminary /lumart Writing: https://paragraph.xyz/@nate collective venturing @venturetothex

Where was this document linked? No hard feelings, but would have been nice to see this ahead of time.

If you were DQ'd it was most likely if it was known shown direct impact to Farcaster, ask for future work, or were primarily built around channels. We explicitly were not supporting channels under the retroPGF umbrella. 

Documented here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vwvgBR1QFV_zwG8sS1iLyvMAQM5a91T4XbM40yDP8Vg/edit?pli=1&tab=t.0#heading=h.hg6e6uk6wdb4