Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/octant
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Inceptionally 🎩
@inceptionally
Thanks to @octant and @tayyab for hosting a huge retrogrant round for Farcaster. Looks like lots of deserving folks are going to get rewarded! Unfortunately, it looks like my entry below was disqualified. I am looking for feedback on why. With ITAP and other channels, I've tried to create spaces for anyone to contribute quality content to Farcaster - amateurs and professionals. Especially non-token related content.
6 replies
4 recasts
22 reactions
Inceptionally 🎩
@inceptionally
Ahh, heard back from @tayyab. Channels aren't eligible (mostly). From their documentation: "Channels: Generally out of scope unless demonstrably exceptional for the Farcaster community." I will endeavor to make ITAP (the number 1 channel!) and my other channels demonstrably exceptional! In the meantime, who wants to lobby @sahil and the @cura team to coordinate and help sponsor a retrogrant round for channel mods and owners! :-)
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
naaate
@naaate
That sucks. It seems I am in the same boat…
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Claireujma 🎩🔵✨
@claireujma
Oh no 😢 I can vote with octant grants. Hope you get back in 🩵
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Midnight Marauder
@midnightmarauder.eth
@octant disqualifying inceptionally is shambolic. Hundreds of daily users for over a year have engaged in ITAP. I also have criticism of how the round voting was set up in general. Way too cliquey…a huge problem with most things here. No offense to Tim Daub but I’ve never even heard of wiki news and he takes 10 percent of the entire rewards? Fwiw I saw many solid builders here get peanuts in comparison.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
amosnena🎩💜
@amosnena
I’m sorry 🥲You deserved it too
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Asylum
@navrajp84
You deserve to be nominated @inceptionally we will support you to the fullest
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction