Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
It’s interesting how much money people in tech have and how trivial it seems to be raise such money. In my world with the exception of a handful of elites and trust fund kid types nobody has any money and it’s a constant struggle to find resources to fund reporting, including reporting that is very popular.
7 replies
10 recasts
23 reactions
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
so i mean absolutely zero shade when i ask this question (i think unbiased news is valuable), but do you think capital flows effectively to people’s revealed pref? As in tech = has money bc people actually pay for what tech is selling vs reporting that can’t make a buck? inb4 free things can also have value
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Derek
@badadvicehq
I definitely know what you mean. The money in tech feel ridiculous sometimes. Like, how do you make $1 million in such a little time and you're not passing out in disbelief?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben
@benersing
It’s tremendously challenging to raise funding in tech. Those who succeed are very public about it and those who don’t, don’t shout it from the rooftops. So there’s an information bias there. That said, yes it’s much easier to raise capital in tech than reporting. Could have a whole conversation about why that likely is. Would make a good podcast episode.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Jack
@jackten
You could probably mint pretty decent money in "journalism" if you're willing to align yourself with a political agenda that pushes the interests of a powerful industry or wealthy facet. It's difficult to get people to pay for the truth though
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nick
@nickysap
Curious if you think something like this might have an impact https://warpcast.com/nickysap/0xf6fd1c15
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
na
@na
where should the money go then, matter, energy, human? 😉 https://warpcast.com/na/0x42987bf9
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jacob
@jrf
tech is a much better business model than the fourth estate
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction