Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
Moxie rewards members daily based on quality of content -- as measured by who & how people engage The system favors engagements by people with more influence in the network. This is by design. Every time they engage they spend their "social capital" to signal to other people in the network that the content is worth their time and attention In this way Moxie rewards attention, and influentials provide attention "boosts" in the feed and on the social graph To make it more "fair" -- we couple that with enabling you to buy Fan Tokens which allow you to participate in the rewards earned by others who are garnering more attention. This allows you to earn by your own actions and by the actions of others. This is a purposeful design. We also welcome constructive criticism and ideas! We've been running this system for 90 day prior to Moxie and we'll run it as-is for at least 30 days prior before any tweaks. All Farcaster data is open on hubs and anyone can present an alternative scoring for us to consider
26 replies
11 recasts
55 reactions
Renée Campbell
@reneecampbell
What makes one account more influential than another? I question the parameters of that because I see a good amount of high quality art accounts that don’t have influence that I think should.
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Marcelo Terça-Nada 💎🎩✨
@marcelonada
Gm Renée, from what I understand, these metrics consider that if people with a high rank follow you and/or interact with your content, you are a person of influence. On the one hand, this is interesting, because it follows the choices of real people, who have been on Warpcast for a long time and are serious. On the other hand, it generates an enormous concentration of power in these people. In any case, no system is perfect.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Renée Campbell
@reneecampbell
Yep. No system is.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
