The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

Would it be ok for an engineer to put people in an unsafe rocket because of demand to go to the moon?

There’s consent which ties into demand. I see that. But in the end it comes down to professional ethics. If unsafe stuff is allowed, people could lose faith in the entire industry (which seems to have already happened for both medicine and aerospace so maybe it’s moot by now)…

Ok I made myself sad.

Yes we are in our anything goes era which is why then there are new third parties stepping up to fill the gap 

Ie this from @naval (h/t @jc4p )

Yes we are in our anything goes era which is why then there are new third parties stepping up to fill the gap 

Ie this from @naval (h/t @jc4p )

https://www.finnrick.com/

I make rockets IRL.
I reserve the right to shamelessly recast for degen reasons. 
Soldier once upon a time.

Oh my bad. I thought you were being tongue in cheek

No, this is a service that tests peptides for safety that are sold by DTC companies

Wonder if this is a sign that FDA will not be regulating peptides as meds

Thanks for sharing!

but these are essentially just purity tests, right?

So even if it's marked Good, it means the samples were pure enough etc, doesn't mean the peptides themselves are 100% safe

Good rule of thumb is if the company offers you store credit for getting something HPLC tested yourself (or a refund for something that comes back as fake), there’s a good chance that it’s a good source. I take a certain supplement that shall not be named, and I look for Janoshik tests from other users before buying anything. This stuff is unregulated and you have to gauge what your risk tolerance is when interacting with vendors. It’s a very good idea to also establish what forums you trust and don’t trust, as each forum is pitted against each other.