Ethereum

404 seems like a solution in search of a problem, but I see its appeal and exploring uncharted territories is always worthwhile.

interesting

Yah learned about them. To me the interesting mechanism is the “burn latest” if you drop below token # req. 
Basically forcing people to send any NFT they want to keep to a burner or cold, else you risk accidentally having it deleted.

in my mind, it’s a cool experiment vis a vis distribution & minting 

that said, I’m seeing a lot of yappers yappin “DIS IS DA FUTURE FINNA CHANGE EVERYTHING” type beat - which - I am not confident on. 

maybe I’m becoming a cryptoboomer. 

related:

Certified @base head, onchain growth guy of your dreams.
-
www.gs.box
-
All casts NFA, DYOR, LOL, BBQ.

also, I’m eternally wary of any “experimental ERCs that didn’t pass the normal process” 

look, I know that these processes can border on onerous but they’re there for a reason. 

everything changes, everything stays the same. I do agree that 1155 is underrated & hype is key. early adopter meta is real.

what would happen if the two biggest standards merged in a token compatible with both DEXes and NFT marketplaces?

not sure this is the best way to achieve it, erc1155 pretty much solves for that already, but support for it has always lacked compared to the two older cousins

thus why I think it's interesting

I still haven’t looked into it deeply, but the gist I’m getting is:

1. It’s destined to fail because it isn’t actually an ERC at all - there’s no attempt to even start an EIP standard
2. Given things like PartyBid and fractional.art, there is an unmet need.

erc404

I can see that... still a bit confused and not sure the hype is justified.  But at least it IS something new, and can see some use cases for various things like speculation, re-roll NFTs, giving people ability to reduce supply by splitting up batches of tokens, etc

100 $DEGEN