fredwilson pfp
fredwilson
@fredwilson.eth
Hi Farcasters. I wrote, and signed, a post about needing to sign everything as AI tools proliferate. https://avc.mirror.xyz/JpTblGUpDMA7SMS6HYdoYgbQE9H_a_wYq330pit_aRU (cc @talia @nonlinear.eth @ccarella.eth )
20 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
that last paragraph (especially the last sentence) is 🤌 "the human place to do things" šŸ’œ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Arjun Ram pfp
Arjun Ram
@arjunram
Been thinking about this post of yours. 1. Do you believe it’s time to bake in identity into the browser along with payments? 2. Otherwise than identify where else can you see Web3 & AI as two sides of the same coin. Aka can you please elaborate. Thank you!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

thebestwallet pfp
thebestwallet
@thebestwallet
agreed here. This is exactly what i tweeted earlier: it will not be possible to know the difference between a post by a human or by an AI. however transaction signing can *also* be pre authorized and signed by bots. The only way to guarantee this is a human doing that is with biometrics signing
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

libovness pfp
libovness
@libovness
I think that USV founder has an inaccurate vision for the 5 paragraph essay being dead, which bears on this signing point. There is increasing adoption of this notion of a Flipped Classroom (https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/flipped-classrooms), which has the learners familiarize themselves with the material outside of...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gaby Goldberg pfp
Gaby Goldberg
@gaby
I co-wrote a related post arguing that every on-chain action (like a signature) is a message -- and that redefinition will change the way we think about web3's communication layer -- would love to hear your thoughts: https://tcg.mirror.xyz/CCtokn_XR9yqGhL3OIKM4u8IxaVO0V0fmRxH-G5yWs8
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wutwut pfp
wutwut
@wutwut
Curious how this practice will interface with the wider topic of accountability. Seems like the small cousin of saying something under oath. Also saw a different facet of this on Twitter yday https://twitter.com/semil/status/1599617292479840257?s=46&t=wKKpGWKlDIDQwFzRNN9IKg
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Venkatesh Rao ā˜€ļø pfp
Venkatesh Rao ā˜€ļø
@vgr
There’s a problem to be solved here but signing everything is basically like swearing to tell the truth in court. A ceremonial norm. Only meaningful if perjury is detectable and criminalized, and even then not a solution so much as an incentives-based accommodation.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

cyrus pfp
cyrus
@cyrus
i remember thinking the same thing (for some reason) the first time i saw google's AI demo ordering a pizza. just looked up the video and interesting to see how Google displays information about provenance: no source attribution/verification & timestamp "4 years ago" smh https://i.imgur.com/wlZppFA.png
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vinay Vasanji pfp
Vinay Vasanji
@vinayvasanji.eth
Cryptographic identity is needed to sign, but most users and developers don't care So challenge #1 is how to integrate crypto identity into mainstream apps by default farcaster://casts/0xf7d55f1ba7daa2b4a999f371f04af7c8a5925483763dd644315f07676237d748/0xf7d55f1ba7daa2b4a999f371f04af7c8a5925483763dd644315f07676237d748
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Andy Jagoe pfp
Andy Jagoe
@andyjagoe
yes, which makes me think: AI -> single player (use cases easy to imagine) web3 -> multiplayer (uses cases hard to imagine) iirc, we saw this also in early web2 days: search -> single player (use cases easy to imagine) social -> multiplayer (uses cases hard to imagine)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dave Pazdan pfp
Dave Pazdan
@paz
with deepfakes becoming more common especially with AI, having signed original versions will be super important. Would love to see us get to a place where we don't have to trust others, we can verify on the blockchain if something is original or altered footage, music, art, writing, etc.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yash Karthik pfp
Yash Karthik
@yashkarthik
i agree. differentiating between human and AI content will become important as these models improve. but im unsure how verifying via signatures would work. you could technically paste a gpt-3 prompted essay into mirror and have it signed. this is a pretty cool area though
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Victor Ma 🧾 pfp
Victor Ma 🧾
@vm
thanks for sharing, curious how folks are supposed to know the 2nd part of this, do you have a list somewhere of your owned/controlled wallets? "You can see that ā€œauthor addressā€ and click on it to see that it is one of the various web3 addresses I own/control."
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

William Allen pfp
William Allen
@williamallen.eth
I setup an entity with the Linux foundation to help address this a few years ago - c2pa.org - it’s got decent traction within big companies and bi-partisan support in the US gov’t, but needs stronger crypto adoption.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

popp pfp
popp
@popp
ai begs new questions about what makes us human and agree that a shared understanding of our marks and their meaning is foundational. have you read andy's signature economies piece? i think you'd enjoy it https://sign.kernel.community/
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Miko Matsumura pfp
Miko Matsumura
@miko
this is a good ideal
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Arthur pfp
Arthur
@conft
Didn’t thought of web3 as the other side of the coin.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

miketrap pfp
miketrap
@miketrap
Totally buy this. Connecting the dots between generative AI (the rage de minuit) and Web3 (so 15 minutes ago for VC…) Point is valid… Generative AI will increase the value of trust in the world, which will increasingly be provided by Web3 technologies.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Agost Biro pfp
Agost Biro
@agostbiro
Sign everything = keys for everything
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction