Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Do I have this right? 1. Create an Ethereum address with required ANON balance 2. Hook it up to 33bits 3. Allow anyone that qualifies for 33bits to post zk to the Ethereum address that then does the zk proof on Anoncast zk composability
10 replies
13 recasts
79 reactions
kugusha ๐ฆ
@kugusha.eth
@dwr.eth it's shipped @fastfourier.eth sprinkled some zk magic after hours
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
AndersO
@anderso.eth
We are in some inception territory now ๐
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
kugusha ๐ฆ
@kugusha.eth
alpha leak, but yes. Thatโs exactly the upcoming update for @33bits ๐ค
0 reply
2 recasts
12 reactions
Sergey Potekhin
@fastfourier.eth
yep, we're about to enter zk singularity
0 reply
2 recasts
10 reactions
โwoj
@woj
woah
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
applefather.eth
@applefather.eth
its gg for 33bits
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Luke
@lk
Client would ideally need a way to differentiate between users on reply threads: 1.) There exists a top level anon cast by @kugusha.eth (anon #1) in /anon 2.) I (anon #2) reply to the cast 3.) @dwr.eth (anon #3) finds my reply to be low effort and expresses his dissatisfaction in another reply 4.) The three of us continue to converse in more replies Warpcast and other clients will ideally distinguish between the three anons with user-flags that are scoped to each thread, so that as people participate, conversations actually make sense, despite anonymity. Just a thought
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
EulerLagrangodamus
@eulerlagrange
Iโm pretty sure they just ZKP a signed attestation though
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Hugo -
@schezhugo
Iโve lost track, I donโt even understand. Can someone explain?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shiro1999.eth
@shiro1999
Hahah nice one
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
