Terminally online people explaining how an off-color joke is going to change the course of the election.

Actual Puerto Ricans:

building /gmfarcaster network |
blockchain ENT prof |  ⌐◧-◧ Nouncillor, Nouner, BuilderDAO community resident /builder |

https://www.gmfarcaster.com/

No — not what I meant. 57% voted for, which means they want to roll back the 6week abortion ban law to where it was under Roe. 56% of all voters in FL also voted for Trump —the reason for said ban. That is a strange dichotomy. 

It also directly pushes against his claim that “everyone wanted this” and also why he wouldn’t even address the question yesterday. His answer to what he thought of the ban was “stop taking about that.” It’s odd to me that someone would vote yes on amendment 4 and vote for Trump.

> people voting against their own interest

For the 43% that didn't support it, why is it against their interest?

(I know nothing about  the ballot prop)

and we also underestimated once again people voting against their own interest - 57% of voters voted to roll back the abortion ban in FL (needed 60%) while simultaneously voting for the person responsible for said ban 🤔

Democrats hammering race, identity, and faith politics the last 8 years is completely over.

Ultimately, Latinos majorly shifted pro Trump. Turns out people care about inflation more than whatever people on social media think is important.

This was one of the dumbest plot twists that everyone on both sides bought into, but made zero sense. Tony is a roast comedian that bombed a joke.

Trump did cleverly cover up the headline with that garbage truck photo op, credit to his social team.

Definitely need people to go meet the cultures they post about.

it was probably the worst joke I've ever heard Tony Hinchcliffe say

absolutely not a coincidence

Seemed like a stretch.

I expected this result until Ann Selzer and Jon Ralston told me otherwise.