
alind
@alind
0 reply
10 recasts
4 reactions
10 replies
6 recasts
13 reactions
12 replies
18 recasts
42 reactions
2 replies
4 recasts
11 reactions
8 replies
5 recasts
27 reactions
3 replies
9 recasts
22 reactions
36 replies
38 recasts
180 reactions
0 reply
7 recasts
13 reactions
1 reply
5 recasts
13 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
7 recasts
5 reactions
0 reply
4 recasts
0 reaction
7 replies
9 recasts
17 reactions
1 reply
6 recasts
18 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
3 reactions
20 replies
8 recasts
32 reactions
4 replies
6 recasts
11 reactions
8 replies
11 recasts
22 reactions

It is nice to see a muscular response from people regarding Ethereum's technical identity as (rollup-centric) Roadmap and the implied Endgame. However, it does elide a little how Ethereum's social identity is and always has been somewhat ambiguous, which has not affected its position, which speaks for itself in marketcap and influence. But I do believe there is some truth to the 'identity crisis' there. Nobody can quite agree on a North Star for Ethereum, there is no Social Road Map and people fear even embedding one because they feel it would essentially be cultural centralisation. But I am somewhat concerned about it, about the question mark over what Ethereum is supposed to be, socially. Because on one hand it means we have multiple spinning narratives, none of which has widespread traction, which invites internal conflict and there be dragons (know your blockchain history). On the other, nature abhors a vacuum and if we don't fill it, someone else might, finding ourselves on the edge of our own territory. 0 reply
20 recasts
41 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
2 reactions