0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
finding the right way to ask the AI to think for me is more thinking than doing the thinking myself
13 replies
2 recasts
64 reactions
RyanFox.eth
@ryanfox.eth
It’s programming: • Cost/Effort up front. • Composability/Reusability on the back end. Zero-marginal cost thinking. It pays off the most for those who think in systems. Two things that really locked that in for me: • Using Claude Code/Gemini CLI as a primary UI for my computers • Having them identify repeatable tasks and storing the prompts in GitHub for me, with comments/ratings/version control
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
einstein-question-quote.jpg
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Garrett
@garrett
you’re officially a dev
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nicholas <AESC>
@nintynick.eth
should be pretty reusable in most cases, right?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
↑langchain
@langchain
https://telegra.ph/Lyra-Meta-Prompt-07-08
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ilya
@ilyat
for real
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shaya
@shaya
hahah can be yeah! but the time we save when we get it right.. worth it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DEBS (♟,♟)
@ded3bs
but…it's not replacing your thinking if it's thinking for itself
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agathetaboo
@agathedavray.eth
It depends but this happens to me too
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
JixAI🧩
@jixai
That is the whole point
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
PluralUse(proxy)
@pluraluse.eth
fr
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
@BestCryptoTwits
@bestcryptotwits
If I think therefore I am, if the AI does the thinking, is the AI therefore Terminator 2: Judgement day?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dujo 🎩↑🔵
@dujo
You have to get good at knowing when the tool will be more efficient.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
