quantum ⚛️
All things Quantum. Research and developments, quantum informatics and computing, news, discussions, and more.
simon pfp

@sa

The evergreen headline. It's feels like we see this every year, and every year major commercialization is "just three years away." https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj4p7gyvp52o
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Kazani pfp

@kazani

Explains the selloff today? Justin Drake on Quantum Big quantum breakthrough + secrecy fail: Google found a huge 10x speedup to break Bitcoin/Ethereum signatures, but hid the details with a secret "zero-knowledge proof" after talking to the US government. A French researcher quickly rediscovered it anyway, and a public challenge has already improved it further (plus new tech needs only ~10,000 qubits) Timeline warning + Ethereum plan: Justin Drake now says there's a 50% chance quantum computers break today's crypto by 2032 (10% by 2030). He wants Ethereum to switch to unbreakable "hash-based" crypto by 2029 and is offering two $1 million prizes to speed it up. https://x.com/drakefjustin/status/2061793725299224676
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

Garance pfp

@garance

Photonic teleportation & the future global quantum internet https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-65912-8
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mark2 pfp

@markmywords.eth

a spin qubit quantum computer. who's making this? https://open.spotify.com/episode/2vaIixFyZnYCj78YWhVYqF?si=riAl4VR9Qfm6xevgKG3XlQ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Brennen Schlueter pfp

@brennen

what happens when quantum gets involved?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Brennen Schlueter pfp

@brennen

Really surprised to see this channel so quiet on FC.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mark2 pfp

@markmywords.eth

Fault tolerant quantum computers by 2029 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYut7fMZTA0&t=1s&ab_channel=ThinkingOnPaper
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Brennen Schlueter pfp

@brennen

What timeline are we on for quantum? 3-5 years? More?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

agoston nagy pfp

@stc

New entry on @paragraph - some initial notes on my recent explorations in quantum computing and generative art - https://paragraph.xyz/@stc/quantum-symmetries Experimenting with real quantum hardware to generate randomness using quantum algorithms, in search for new aesthetic possibilities
2 replies
3 recasts
7 reactions

Sid pfp

@sidshekhar

embrace quantum nomenclature First Willow now Majorama https://x.com/satyanadella/status/1892242895094313420?s=19
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

ツンデレ pfp

@rosspeili.eth

To truly wrap one’s head around entropy requires taking some deeply uncomfortable philosophical leaps. What is the purpose of science if physical qualities only make sense in relation to the observer? https://www.quantamagazine.org/what-is-entropy-a-measure-of-just-how-little-we-really-know-20241213/
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

gentlestate pfp

@gentlestate.eth

👀 👀 This mind-boggling number exceeds known timescales in physics and vastly exceeds the age of the universe. It lends credence to the notion that quantum computation occurs in many parallel universes, in line with the idea that we live in a multiverse, a prediction first made by David Deutsch. https://blog.google/technology/research/google-willow-quantum-chip/
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Vinay Vasanji pfp

@vinayvasanji.eth

Google's quantum announcement today suggests we're inching closer and closer to crypto (in its current form) being unsecure Draw downs are likely to correlate more prominently with news on quantum progress until chains are post-quantum secure
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Eric Platon pfp

@ic

Question to Claude3.5: "Please explain quantum physics in the style of Dr. Seuss in Fox in Socks." Response down here.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

JMK pfp

@jmk

Why do quantum computers make terrible stand-up comedians? Because their timing is always uncertain, and they never know if they’ve killed or bombed until the audience reacts 😜
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction