will pfp
will
@w
@mikedemarais.eth out of curiosity, is there an internal whitelist for contracts from multichain-native factories etc?
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Daniel Sinclair pfp
Daniel Sinclair
@danielsinclair
Looking into this! Typically we show this when the address matches an indexed ERC-20 address (to prevent accidental burning). What address is triggering this for you?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

diid pfp
diid
@diid
I got this from my wallet sending to 0x0a2b10589Bb50F0Cdf344285Ed4422eA40004180 on mainnet, which is just one of our Splits Teams smart wallets! Definitely a contract so the warning isn't wrong, I just had to click through that warning twice to send which was not super ideal. Don't want folks to get the wrong idea!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

will pfp
will
@w
@danielsinclair any update here?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

will pfp
will
@w
@mikedemarais.eth bump
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

grunt.eth pfp
grunt.eth
@grunt
I don’t believe we have an internal list for removing the warning, it’s very useful to stop ppl from sending to ERC20 contracts and others But we may have to look into it RE 7702 enabled wallet addresses?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction