Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
If I predict rain tomorrow based on satellite and radar imagery showing a cold front forming, and it does rain, I’m right. If I predict rain because I saw a black cat walk under a ladder, and it rains, am I right (but for the wrong reasons) or am I just wrong? Can one ever be right for the wrong reasons?
7 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
You have three "objects": Predictions, Reality, and a function Outcome(p, for p in Predictions) that maps Predictions to Reality. So, what's your question? If Outcome() is a good function? If outcome(p1) for a specific prediction p1 was right?
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Is outcome() a good function? It depends on your metric for "good functions". For example: - Good1: means that for every prediction p outcome(p) is what happens. (Usually we don't call this prediction, but a law of physics) - Good2: outcome(p) is better than random(p), i.e. you get better results than a random guess.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Good3: outcome() gets a lot of attention when I discuss it with friends. Good4: If I invest X amount based on this function, I will always make a profit.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
My concern is where the prediction maps onto reality but for erroneous (i.e., probably wrong) reasons. Let me attempt one more example: I predict that two separate coins, when tossed, will fall on heads. I toss both coins, and sure enough, they fall on heads. I was right in both predictions. It is then revealed…
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction