Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
there was more experimentation from DAOs w/ frames last year than w/ mini apps this year (e.g.: @botto, @vocdoni, @nouns prop house, @orangedao app). is this due to DAOs falling off a bit? or due to a frustrating frames experience that discouraged them from mini apps? something else? would love opinions (+ intros!)
42 replies
32 recasts
207 reactions
Vocdoni 🗳️ pfp
Vocdoni 🗳️
@vocdoni
We think that is a multifaceted problem, and many DAOs fail because their foundational principles are weak. For years, the ecosystem tried to build fully trustless orgs, but that model is set to fail, as it only fits a tiny subset of use cases (like Protocol DAOs). Most of the orgs rely on trust, leadership, and doocracy to function. That said, there’s still plenty of room for experimentation. We believe Farcaster has the potential to become a strong home for DAOs (and communities) by solving many recurring DAO challenges with things that are already built: enabling governance directly within the feed, supporting reputation systems and identity layers, offering notifications, and making discussion frictionless.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Vocdoni 🗳️ pfp
Vocdoni 🗳️
@vocdoni
If on top of that, we add govtech like DAVINCI.vote (via miniapps/frames) we can provide a more usable governance layer with anonymous, gasless voting that offers the same guarantees as onchain voting. But all of this depends on Farcaster choosing to lean into that vision. The frequent pivots* (like abandoning channels/communities or the shift away from Frames v1) create uncertainty for developers who are expected to bet on the platform and invest their own resources. *We understand that pivots are part of the process, but Farcaster also needs to provide developers building on top with a sense of stability, and at least on an emotional level.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction