Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Bard seems to still make mistakes more often than chatgpt. A couple of pretty strange ones in this answer.
39 replies
110 recasts
564 reactions
Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
ok wat
4 replies
2 recasts
64 reactions
โ†‘ j4ck ๐Ÿฅถ icebreaker.xyz โ†‘ pfp
โ†‘ j4ck ๐Ÿฅถ icebreaker.xyz โ†‘
@j4ck.eth
the quality is baffling, theyโ€™re fumbling the bag pretty hard imo
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
casslin.eth pfp
casslin.eth
@casslineth
Claude 2 was good
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Jarrett pfp
Jarrett
@jarrettr
Should try again with the new "gemini" premium
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dean Pierce ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป๐ŸŒŽ๐ŸŒ pfp
Dean Pierce ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป๐ŸŒŽ๐ŸŒ
@deanpierce.eth
The best thing about Bard is that it has access to Google's Knowledge Graph, so it's good at finding, connecting, and summarizing recent information, and pointing you directly at relevant blog posts or documentation. Bard's reasoning can get weird, but IMO it's better than ChatGPT for navigating cutting edge research.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mayank ๐Ÿ—ฏ๏ธ pfp
Mayank ๐Ÿ—ฏ๏ธ
@meluhian.eth
There have been numerous instances where Bard made blunders, particularly when it comes to dates and years.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
hkgambler pfp
hkgambler
@hkgambler
I've been paying for Google Ads on that topic specifically to mislead Bard. Sorry about that.
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
Eric pfp
Eric
@ecent18
Have you played around with Grok? How would you compare it? I find myself gravitating to it more than gpt given its access to X data + less reminders / disclaimers of it being an AI and hesitating to answer questions.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Richge ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿซ‚ pfp
Richge ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿซ‚
@richge
should you create you own AI ser
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
afool41 pfp
afool41
@u8f14.eth
ๆˆ‘ๅ€‹ไบบ่ช็‚บ - ้›–็„ถๆœ‰ไบ›้Œฏ่ชค, ไฝ†ๆ˜ฏๆ•ด้ซ”็œ‹่ตทไพ†่งฃ้‡‹ๅพ—ๅพˆ่ฉณ็ดฐๅˆๆœ‰ๆข็†็š„ๅ–”.. ๆˆ‘่ ป้ฉš่จ AI ่ƒฝๅค ๅšๅˆฐ้€™ๆจฃ.. ไนŸ่จฑๆˆ‘ๆฒ’ๆœ‰้‚ฃ้บผๅธธ็”จ AI ๅง.. ไธ้Ž, ๆˆ‘ๆ›ด้ฉš่จ็š„ๆ˜ฏไฝ ็š„ไธญๆ–‡ๅทฒ็ถ“่ฌ›ๅพ—้€™้บผๅฅฝไบ† !?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zach Harris pfp
Zach Harris
@zachharris.eth
You got a feed your learning model that fine vintage copywritten intellectual property and not pay the owners of the content for itโ€ฆ Snack on Grade A hallucinations, without any of that ethical baggage of paying the rights holders for it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
plan dec pfp
plan dec
@plandecember
๐Ÿ‘€
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ensgiant.eth ๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿ†“ pfp
ensgiant.eth ๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿ†“
@ensgiant.eth
Hey @vitalik.eth gift your boy CZ his .ETH itโ€™s listed for 3.5 ETH
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Bird pfp
Bird
@mockingbird
it's surprising how bad Bard is. I think there is little incentive to move away from ChatGPT right now
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jorge pfp
Jorge
@japonts
Vitalik y sus pensamientos crรญticos. Otro level!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
minimalist.degen pfp
minimalist.degen
@prakashghai
chatgpt is also sub-par
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Richard Gallagher pfp
Richard Gallagher
@pudgyrich
ChatGPT is much tooo woke for my liking. Woke ai is worse than fake news
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kes ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Kes ๐ŸŽฉ
@kes
Bard feels like a year or two away from ChatGPT. From experience, Iโ€™m having trouble making it understand priming prompts. It is also having difficulty stringing together additional prompts with the original prompt.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Coach pfp
Coach
@thecoach
I tried to use Bard when researching cloud computing companies for a Business Dev role I had. It was brutal, context was bad but the actual response held no validity when further researched. It would pull fake answers and provide links to back them up that had no relevance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction