Give me 5 reasons why I should spent effort on grading students papers.

I believe the students gave gpt the context (her organization, the papers they read) and got 80% of her work done like that

I used AI to grade the last 4 assignments after coming across one too many too LLMesque sentence. Now we got AI writing papers and AI grading them. What a bullshit system. 

The hard part is that I'm not up for playing whack a mole. Assignments need to change to take into account that students will use AI, but they still have to learn something (that's an assumption). Currently trying to formulate feedback in a way that students keep thinking about their work. 

Maybe we should just require transcripts of GPT-chats and grade the prompts?

data analyst| seeker of adventure | survivor of chaos | single parent x 4 | host /kbc /single-parenting
seemore.tv/free/fc/kbc

We did some summer course tasks that cannot be done with GPT that require actual thinking 😅
I had an assignment that asked for a lot of personal reflection and to watch an episode of Finnish TV show, and then adapt the characters to the task. No GPT could do that.

Transparent Eyeball founder / games marketing / Alusta.art / former Decentraland / 3D scanning statues onchain / DAO Academy founder / mom x 2 / 🇫🇮 

Interesting. Makes me think we should maybe reduce the word count but require full sentences.

Students are working professionals. So I get why they are using GPT. Just not gonna grade AI generated papers