Weekly rewards are meant to support creators who spend their time and energy creating engaging content on Farcaster. 

We've seen some accounts try to trick the algo by coordinating engagement, and redirect rewards towards low effort or uninteresting content. We're making changes to fix this. 

1. The algo will reward diverse weekly engagement. If you get two likes from different people, they'll give you more points than two likes from the same person.

2. The algo may reduce or eliminate points from some accounts based on heuristics (engaging with spammy accounts, only with a particular account, in time patterns that suggest coordination etc) 

These changes will roll out on Tuesday. For more details on how rewards work, see the page below.

https://farcasterhq.notion.site/Farcaster-Creator-Rewards-1f56a6c0c101808f9225c5705ae88fcc

since Pro users are subsidizing Engagement Rewards at the protocol level, when will we have more say on the rewards algo?

Solving public goods value capture. | /impact | book.abundance.id

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

I was looking for a more formal process but accepting feedback is a good baseline. 

my question then is how is "interesting content" determined by the algo?

if it's a manual process, how do we ensure the determination aligns w what the network views as "interesting" or valuable (and not just the personal taste of 1-2 individuals at Merkle)?