Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

typeof.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
typeof.eth πŸ”΅
@typeof.eth
Unpopular opinion: CSS modules > Tailwind
4 replies
2 recasts
21 reactions

pugson pfp
pugson
@pugson
hate using those for quick prototyping tho
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

typeof.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
typeof.eth πŸ”΅
@typeof.eth
Hate using which? CSS modules or tailwind?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

typeof.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
typeof.eth πŸ”΅
@typeof.eth
Nvm, I got it. Yeah dude, agreed. I’ll reach for shadcn for that, which is Tailwind but I don’t mind if it’s essentially just styling someone else’s component library. Maintaining a component library that uses tailwind has a bunch of problems though. And if I was building a component library from scratch, I’d just reach for CSS modules. No conflicts with the consumer, I know CSS better than tailwind, and honestly I feel like you I worse markup with tailwind. It makes it easy to be lazy.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

typeof.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
typeof.eth πŸ”΅
@typeof.eth
lol @ β€œyou I.” Meant to say β€œI write.” Originally meant the royal you but switched it to I cause I must carry every burden.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction