Content pfp
Content
@
https://ethereum.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
timbeiko.eth pfp
timbeiko.eth
@tim
Unfortunately there doesn’t seem to be a ton of interest for L1 privacy. It’s obviously extremely complex, but I really wish we spent like 20% of the brainpower that we spend on “solving MEV” towards L1 privacy. The extent to which we may all just be building surveillance infrastructure is underrated.
9 replies
33 recasts
205 reactions
timbeiko.eth pfp
timbeiko.eth
@tim
I have immense respect for all teams working on app & L2-level privacy, but my fear is none of them have sufficiently strong network effects to impose their values on the world. Bitcoin will never go private. Ethereum is the only chain that could conceivably do this and still be adopted.
0 reply
0 recast
16 reactions
Matt Solomon pfp
Matt Solomon
@msolomon.eth
I think a great first step here is for someone write the equivalent of @vitalik.eth’s rollup centric roadmap but for for privacy, to give the community a vision to rally behind https://warpcast.com/msolomon.eth/0xff928f03
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Dean Pierce 👨‍💻🌎🌍 pfp
Dean Pierce 👨‍💻🌎🌍
@deanpierce.eth
The Privacy Pools and Proof of Innocence stuff seems like the most active area of work for L1 privacy stuff right now. The ZK Wormhole stuff also could be pretty promising. Needs to be built into everyday wallets though. https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-7503-zero-knowledge-wormholes-private-proof-of-burn-ppob/15456
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
How do we channel brainpower in this direction?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
pintail pfp
pintail
@pintail
Absolutely. Why is this? I would have thought that this way of thinking would be common amongst both researchers and devs. Do you think people are self-censoring?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Toni Wahrstätter pfp
Toni Wahrstätter
@toniw.eth
Yeah, fully agree! Stealth Adresses (ERC-5564) have great potential in brining some ptivacy to L1 without requiring any mixing (which is risky nowadays). The contracts for 5564 are audited and deployed soon and hopefully we'll see many different implementations then.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Cardinal Error 🎩 pfp
Cardinal Error 🎩
@101010
IDK seems MEV is far more important to most ppl
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
hikaru pfp
hikaru
@hikaru
I completely agree with this. Lack of privacy could undermine major protocols, and it should be prioritized at least in theory.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xKlinko pfp
0xKlinko
@0xklinko
This seems like it’ll increasingly become more important. Celsius, et al publicized a ton of addresses. Do you view privacy as an L2 or more of a smart contract wallet where you can execute TXs from something like a big anonymized pool?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kevin pfp
kevin
@cfo
based
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ty pfp
Ty
@faultproof
If the demand arises, the privacy enabled blockchain/rollup/whatever will come if there’s money to be made by the builders. Don’t think this is something to worry about tbh
9 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Andy pfp
Andy
@andyguzmaneth
Bring the wormholes! https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7503
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manator.eth 🎩🍖💊🍓 pfp
Manator.eth 🎩🍖💊🍓
@manator
A CBDC in disguise without actually planning to do so.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
pcfreak30 pfp
pcfreak30
@pcfreak30
greed > civil rights :(.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cat🎩🔵 pfp
Cat🎩🔵
@catrussell
Multiple tools being built regarding this Spillways and 0x0 and mind network for example But those all are made to obscufiate individual transactions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction