Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/politics
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
In just 3 days, Jeremy Corbyn’s new leftist political party has surpassed 500,000 members making it the largest political party membership in the UK
3 replies
1 recast
11 reactions

Mike | Abundance 🌟 pfp
Mike | Abundance 🌟
@abundance
party membership doesn't win elections tho. seems the new party splits the labor vote (15%-15%) and gives Reform (the right-wing populist party) 34% (Labor currently has a massive majority in parliament with just 32%) so yea, take note indeed
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
Fearmongering on vote splitting is a great way to never get anywhere. Especially since, as centrist parties tend to vote more often with right wing parties on bills than with left parties. And since, much of this split is expected to have come from the Labour Party directly who have lost 300,000 members since 2019. There shouldn’t be as big of a “split” as you imply. So yeah, lesson in there, ignore this kind of nonsensical, go-nowhere thinking.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mike | Abundance 🌟 pfp
Mike | Abundance 🌟
@abundance
lost 300,000 members since 2019 yet won one of the greatest majorities in parliament in UK history.. not sure where it is you're trying to get, but if it's a place where pointing out historical facts is "fearmongering" that must be ignored or suppressed then it's nowhere I want to be
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
Seems more like you are trying to suggest the UK and the US should stick to principally two party systems; more specifically the same ones they have now. Forgive me if I misunderstood.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mike | Abundance 🌟 pfp
Mike | Abundance 🌟
@abundance
I'm not trying to suggest anything. I'm pointing out that party membership doesn't reflect election results UK is not a two party system - smaller parties still have (outsized) influence in coalition govts but that still implies that the parties need to collectively win a majority, which is unlikely if the vote is distributed as per the poll (which can obviously change a lot by election time) in the US I doubt this even applies. third parties have no say at all (historically), and the way to push your agenda is to take over one of the parties - much like Trump did with Rs (MAGA is hardly a traditional conservative ideology)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction